Re: It's not the trolls I mind so much. It's the boring trolls

In article
<5a5e526b-b688-4578-bb88-ecb2aae1fd71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Glenn <GlennSheldon@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 20, 10:46 pm, Michael Siemon <mlsie...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<0c45b4e8-f416-4f2d-9a12-63b2f7d1c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,



 Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, Michael Siemon <mlsie...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<ecab2e79-3db3-4097-9fc3-4cdaff43d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

 Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 20, 10:01 pm, Michael Siemon <mlsie...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<77344f4e-0bdc-422f-b9e5-4c5b373ea...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

 Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 20, 9:06 pm, Kermit <unrestrained_h...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 20, 7:03 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 20, 7:30 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Glenn wrote:
On Dec 20, 6:11 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
All-seeing-I wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:16 pm, John Harshman
<jharsh...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You know who you are. Or maybe not.
How many evolutionist-trolls are there?
None that I know of. There are plenty of boring posters,
but
none of
them seem to be trolls. Guess who I was actually talking
about.

Pretty much anyone who you want to troll, not just one
person.
Look
to
the subject header for clues. Classic.

As is so often the case, I find it hard to figure out what
you're
saying.

Guess.

I would guess that either you don't know yourself, or you know
it
is
vacuous. Otherwise, you'd be explaining yourself a little more
clearly, especially when asked.

What are you trying to say?

That your post being commented on is incomprehensible gibberish.
Care to rephrase?

Huh?

You said:

"Pretty much anyone who you want to troll, not just one person. Look
to the subject header for clues. Classic."

I haven't got a clue what you mean by this word salad. So, once again,
care to rephrase?

What's "care to rephrase" mean?

Please explain what the hell you are trying to say. OK? Because there
is ZERO meaning conveyed to anyone else in what you have said so far.

If you are just plucking your magic twanger, that's fine -- but why
pretend to participate in a public conversation?

If you really, really want me to keep insulting you, you can continue
to pretend ignorance. I am retired. I can do this forever.  All I am
urging is that you make your comment such that readers know what the
hell it is you are saying. Because you have not yet done so. I do not
even care _what_ you are saying; I'd just like to find out what the
fuck that is.

If you are taking an adolescent joy in your readers not being able
to make any sense of your posts, I will eventually get bored and go
away. But you are far too old for that to be a good role to play.
It is _your_ choice. Make (some sort of) sense, or be ridiculed; I
am not asking you to make "evolutionary" sense, or "liberal" sense
or any other sort of sense that you might feel uncomfortable with.
I am simply saying that your words are MEANINGLESS. And if that is
what you are here for, then I guess you _are_ one of those "boring
trolls." Quelle surprise...

Carry on then. Just imagine I hit the return button each time you post.

Boring troll it is. Not a big surprise. Just imagine that I wave my
nether parts in your general direction whenever you post, and I will
not bother to exert myself.

.

Relevant Pages