Re: The Hoax called Evolution

On Dec 17, 7:15 pm, All-Seeing-I <allseei...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It does not get much simpler then this:

"..let us take a look back in history and trace the necessary
steps for this new pheromone to have formed. According to the
Theory of Evolution , at some point in time long ago there
must have been..." [read more]

http://www.evolutionhoax.com/book_chapter1.pdf

Lloyd why don't you just give it up. You are a certified fruitcake
and rigid religious fundamentalist and your Essene beliefs are just
more icing on the loon cake full of nuts crap you post.

Your sectarian outsider stance may make you think you are one of the
special chosen people with special knowledge by the chosen to impart
to the uninformed TOers. But you are just another oddball deviant in
the religious spectrum. Your Essene religious beliefs encourage and/
or allow you to make up your own crap about the origins of humans with
alien DNA exchanges during the Sumerian period. These bizarre beliefs
are never ever going to be accepted by anyone but the most gullible
and/or uneducated people who are incapable like you of understanding
scientific empirical evidence. Science is never as dumb, incompetent
or in error as you frequently claim it to be. The pattern of
empirical information about evolution is overwhelming and you cannot
read the professional literature to make your false and stupid claims
about it being a hoax.

The real hoax is you Lloyd. You cannot produce any DNA that is
identifiable as alien. You don't even know how to begin to find the
evidence for biological sequences much less alien DNA. It doesn't
exist. None of the crap in your ancient texts you claim is evidence
against evolution and/or for another alternative theory of origins.
None of your crap will withstand a systematic and competent scientific
analysis. Even a cursory look at the stuff you post is silly beyond
belief.

You have posted a ton of infertile bull shit that has produced nothing
substantive. So Lloyd get a life or provide some empirical evidence
that meets the canons of science instead of science fiction.

Space left below for more whining about scientific bias. And he is
right. The bias is toward replicable, measurable, and problematic
statements that can be scientifically tested.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: No Comment.
    ... fall into the realm of science. ... scientific habits of mind he needs to learn to think - that's my job. ... The same can be said of evolution. ... empirical evidence for creationism. ...
    (rec.scuba)
  • Re: No Comment.
    ... fall into the realm of science. ... scientific habits of mind he needs to learn to think - that's my job. ... The same can be said of evolution. ... No one is saying that there is empirical evidence for creationism. ...
    (rec.scuba)
  • Re: No Comment.
    ... fall into the realm of science. ... scientific habits of mind he needs to learn to think - that's my job. ... The same can be said of evolution. ... empirical evidence for creationism. ...
    (rec.scuba)
  • Re: No Comment.
    ... fall into the realm of science. ... scientific habits of mind he needs to learn to think - that's my job. ... The same can be said of evolution. ... No one is saying that there is empirical evidence for creationism. ...
    (rec.scuba)
  • Re: No Comment.
    ... fall into the realm of science. ... scientific habits of mind he needs to learn to think - that's my job. ... The same can be said of evolution. ... empirical evidence for creationism. ...
    (rec.scuba)