Re: Let's get this straight
- From: Bob Casanova <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:24:13 -0700
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:23:49 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Inez
<savagemouse123@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Nov 25, 8:59 am, heekster <heeks...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:10:32 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I
<ap...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:37:48 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by All-Seeing-I
<allseei...@xxxxxxx>:
All life started with an "original" and "created" kind.
Well, it didn't take long to get from "let's get this
straight" to "this is what I believe, based on zero
evidence".
One sentence.
Congratulations.
<snip Non-Seeing-Idiocy>
Yet you cannot refute without personal attacks.
Yet, there was no personal attack. It seems that you lie.
In fairness <Snip non-seeing idiocy> might fairly be called a personal
attack.
Where he goes wrong is to assume that Mr. Casanova couldn't respond
without a personal attack. I believe that he could, it just wouldn't
have been as much fun.
Actually, I did respond, by observing that it only took him
one sentence to go from "Let's get this straight" to the
assertion that his personal beliefs were to be accepted
without any sort of support. The term "Non-Seeing-Idiot"
followed directly from that observation; either he didn't
see that his claim was spurious, or he believed it wasn't
spurious due to his inability to think. Maybe I should have
specified "Non-Seeing-or-Idiot"...
Why is that?
Why do you always proffer an imbecilic canard, in lieu of any actual
evidence?-
He hasn't got any.
He never does.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
.
- References:
- Let's get this straight
- From: All-Seeing-I
- Re: Let's get this straight
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: Let's get this straight
- From: All-seeing-I
- Re: Let's get this straight
- From: heekster
- Re: Let's get this straight
- From: Inez
- Let's get this straight
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are there seashells on the top of Mount Everest K0oks?
- Next by Date: Re: For Harshman: Natural Selection & Causation
- Previous by thread: Re: Let's get this straight
- Next by thread: Re: Let's get this straight
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|