Re: Evolutionists and Bird Poop

Himself wrote:
Evolutionists claim that multifarious forms most cool and beautiful
have arisen by random mutations filtered by natural selection. They
also say that human beings are a product of this undirected process.
Therefore, according to the evolutionist mantra, other lineages could
have given rise to intelligent and even civilized beings - it was just
a matter of chance that it was monkey-like creatures that lucked out.

Actually, there's little to indicate that other "linages" would have
produced intelligent life at all. Intelligent life is not the goal of
evolution, and there's no real indication that if evolution were replayed,
any branch of the tree of life would have produced intelligent life.


According to deluded evolutionist "logic" other creatures such as
birds could have been the ones to develop language, technology and
civilization.

Maybe, maybe not. Birds don't have forearms useful for grasping, so
development of technology would most likely have been difficult. Some
whale species have intelligence comparable to humans, but they haven't
invented technology, written languages, or civilization, at least as we know
it.

They conveniently leave out of their just-so story the
fact that birds excrete both urine and feces through a single passage:
the cloaca - an unfortunate anatomical fact that means all members of
the class Aves are incontinent.

What does that have to do with civilzation, or technology?

If you don't believe me, just look at
the rocks of your nearest seabird rookery or at the bottom of your
parakeet cage.

Few species have developed indoor plumbing. What's your point?


These same evolutionists claim they are able to make predictions based
on their "theory." Well, how about this one? If an avian civilization
is discovered, I predict that the newspaper industry will be highly
prosperous.

Why? For millions of years, humans excreted their wastes, yet didn't
require newspapers.

They're going to need a LOT of newspapers. Any future
ambassedors to avian civilizations had best watch where they sit. To
evolutionists, this sort of speculation will probably seem more
reasonable than the simple assumption that human beings were designed
to develop civilization.

Ok, I call "Loki". Whoever it is, take a bow.

DJT




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics
    ... Evolution in a different level, ... Response: ... Ever since science and technology really ... Dreams" but I always like the thesis behind "Civilization and its ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics
    ... Evolution and Reason ... > with technological adaptation. ... > physics, technology, science, medicine and other fields have been made ... > in constant conflict with the requirements of civilization. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Dinosaurs
    ... So you're not talking about intelligent life, ... has far surpassed us in technology. ... another civilization could be thousands of years ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics
    ... Evolution in a different level, like superseding biological adaptation ... science and technology that we will subsequently ... Dreams" but I always like the thesis behind "Civilization and its ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Dinosaurs
    ... So you're not talking about intelligent life, ... has far surpassed us in technology. ... another civilization could be thousands of years ...
    (talk.origins)