Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:15:12 GMT, Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:17:57 -0800 (PST), Suzanne
<leilani7@xxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

On Nov 19, 10:48 am, Ye Old One <use...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:43:55 -0800 (PST), Suzanne
<leila...@xxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:





On Nov 16, 7:25 pm, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suzanne wrote:

 >>

I'm sorry Harry, but having a degree in a science
does make someone a scientist, whether or not
you like it. When a person has earned a degree
in a field that educational institutions declare is a
science, that person has earned the right to be called
a scientist. I'm equally sure that each of the schools
that confer these degrees upon people have not
consulted you to get your approval.

Suzanne wet to great lengths to say that Von Braun was a scientist because
of a degree that he had.
Now she says the opposite.

No, that is not true, Mike, I have not said that
Von Broun was not a scientist. I've said that he
was a scientist.

He was an engineer.

That is because he was a
scientist as well as being a rocket engineer.
He had a double degree, but his Ph.D. was in
Physics.

So what?



Dr. Wernher Von Braun was also the first
director of NASA.

No he was not. He was never the director of NASA.

Here is a list of the men that have held the job, correctly termed the
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[tedious list deleted]

Do you see a pattern there? Like we never see WvB's name recorded?

I see a problem that you apparently do not see.

Then I think you should get your eyes tested.


"In 1960 he is appointed as the first director of
a new government agency. It's called NASA."

NASA was formed on the 29th July 1958.

This is correct, but you would be more convincing
if you used a certain document verifying this. Do
you want me to give you the URL, too?

FFS you stupid woman, you have been given link after link after link -
all showing you to be wrong.

History International: "Man, Moment, Machine,"
2005; Narration by Hunter Ellis.

Try checking your facts before posting - you could end up looking a
little more sensible if you did.

: ) Just find the document and be a hero, mouth.

Ok, as you seem to be so brain dead that you can't find a simple date
for yourself. Here, once again, is a link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasa

"NASA was established by the National Aeronautics and Space Act on
July 29, 1958, replacing its predecessor, the National Advisory
Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). The agency became operational on
October 1, 1958"

You can check the list of facilities it has starting here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasa#Research_centers

Or better yet, go to the horse's mouth, nasa.gov, where you can
find the statement "President Dwight D. Eisenhower established
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 1958,
partially in response to the Soviet Union's launch of the first
artificial satellite the previous year. NASA grew out of the
National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA), which had been
researching flight technology for more than 40 years."

There's more.


--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@xxxxxxx) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
    ... Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ... It's called NASA." ... if you used a certain document verifying this. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Russian astrologer cleared to sue Nasa
    ... >lawsuit against the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa) ... >for plans to bombard a comet whose destruction would "disrupt the natural ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Nasa and not NASA?
    ... which President Johnson has decided to entrust not to Nasa but to the ... For me the organization remains the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and not the "National aeronautics and space administration" and the lower case usage jars me. ... I wasn't sure if it was an administration or an agency so I checked the NASA web side. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Election Implications For NASA
    ... NASA is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ... solving "tangible problems on Earth", and attempts to sell it as such get ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
    ... Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ... It's called NASA." ... this is just more of Suzanne LYING for jeezus... ... we are all asking YOU to back up what YOU have been saying. ...
    (talk.origins)