Re: Baylor says that adman is an idiot

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:49:19 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On 20 Nov 2009 01:05:10 GMT, John McKendry <jlastname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


I saw that, too, and I really, really doubt it. For one thing, why
would a seminary have a biology department?

although i doubt the GTU teaches creationism, dont forget that dembski
teaches at the whorehouse known as the 'southwest baptist theological
seminary'.

Dembski doesn't claim to be a biologist, though. He is "Research
Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Cultural
Engagement". In one sense, it is possible to teach Creationism without
saying anything about biology; that's what Dembski does. But I wouldn't
expect the people at Northwest Creation Network to recognize Dembskiism
as a legitimate form of Creationism. I mean, if I'm looking for
"Colleges and Universities that Believe or Teach Biblical Creation
Science", I don't want some milquetoast liberal arts college
where my kids hear about Intelligent Design in Philosophy class.
I want a school where they can learn the real scientific content
of Creation Science, like the fact that Tyrannosaurus teeth were
too shallow-rooted to be useful for meat-eating, and the fact that
if the Earth were anywhere near as old as Darwinists say it is,
the oceans would be full of sand, and the fact that catastrophic
flooding can create a formation like the Grand Canyon in a matter
of months. Real, solid, fact-based science like that is taught in
Biology classes, not Philosophy classes.

And by that standard, I don't think GTU measures up.

John

.

Relevant Pages