Re: why Why WHY
- From: Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:27:04 GMT
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:38:35 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I
<apc57@xxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
Why can't you kooks understand that science is NOT the sum total of
human understanding?
Why can't you kooks understand that science is NOT the sum total of
human perception?
Why can't you kooks understand that science is NOT the sum total of
human ability?
################
why Why WHY?
###############
WAKE UP PEOPLE
################
why Why WHY?
###############
Madman (aka Mudbrain) is on record as claiming:-
That 3.5% actually means 25%...
That the actor Paul Newman was a creationist...
That "Dr." Kent Hovind has made lots of *scientific* discoveries...
That wars have been fought because some scientific finding discredited
some facet of some religion...
To have a "higher education" than most posters to this news group...
To understand how geologists determine the age of any given sample of
rock...
That trilobites were Cambrian mammals... [that one still makes me
laugh]
And that he has "created genes" and not evolved ape genes...
That linguists have traced all the world's languages to the Middle
East region and back to around the same time as the bible claims Noah
and his sons rebuilt mankind.
Claimed that talk.origin's moderator was a troll.
Claimed cigarettes do not cause cancer.
Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
Certainly I don't.
--
Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why Why WHY
- From: spintronic
- Re: why Why WHY
- References:
- why Why WHY
- From: All-seeing-I
- why Why WHY
- Prev by Date: Re: fun factoid
- Next by Date: Re: the end of your dating hogwash as requested
- Previous by thread: Re: why Why WHY
- Next by thread: Re: why Why WHY
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|