Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents

Your views are unacceptable. Civilized people do not consider good and
evil as any kind of inherent material attribute. Good and evil resides
in the spiritual realm, which does the job of making choices, turning
out one way or another alternatively. And because it can turn out one
way or another we can only regard good and evil subjectively, by
making judgements=decisions of our own by our own spirit.

It's an objective fact that the Darwinists deny freedom. We can
reasonably expect the denial of freedom to lead to terrible
consequences.


On 8 nov, 14:26, wf3h <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 8, 7:31 am, "nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx"

<nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whatever, you just substantiate everything I say.
- you make a science of good and evil by saying good and evil are in
the mind of people, instead of the spiritual realm, so to make good
and evil material things of a sort

tell you what...remove a person's brain (IOW make them a creationist)

see how much evil they do.  the brain is material evil resides within
the brain. that's provable

- you continuously fight against any knowledge about freedom
- you discount the main intellectual opposition to racism throughout
history

which certainly wasn't religion. every single slave owner in US
history was a creationist.



Your opposition to racism is based on a lie, that there are no genetic
differences between people, and groups of people. Remember the
holocaust started out with killings of the mentally and physically
disabled. It is well possible that some of these disabilities were
based on genetics, although many of them were only thought to be based
on genetics, because the scientists could only think in terms of
physical cause and effect.

which has nothing to do with evolution. the fact some diseases are
genetic (Iike my own tourette's syndrome) has NOTHING to do with how
people view those diseases. you think my job has never been in
jeopardy because a boss viewed my genetic problem as a social issue?

you know nothing, ignorant creationist

 Especialy for many mental diseases, just

like now in China, they cannot think that such may be because of a
lack of friends, or parents etc. simply because friendship and family
doesn't really figure in terms of cause and effect.

so nando lays the blame for genetic illnesses on the victim, rather
than blaming the CORRECT cause: genetics. next he'll tell us women
deserve breast cancer and MD patients deserve to die.

such is creationism

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: computer simulation
    ... ending the institutionalized rape of Iraqi women. ... This is a VR computer simulation. ... genetics. ... All evil people in history considered they where doing good. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes its adherents
    ... - you make a science of good and evil by saying good and evil are in ... based on genetics, although many of them were only thought to be based ... people view those diseases. ... such is creationism ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Answers to quiz + ASAT capability & the future of space itself
    ... Mendel's genetics was for simple characteristics. ... don't think a low cost launch facility is desirable at all. ... Nobody is putting a laser system in place. ... "False words are not only evil in themselves, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
    ... GENETICS does not make the man, and certainly not the way you ... Race is about genetics. ... Racial genetics does not ... make someone evil. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Mark Isaak is trapped
    ... because it is science and therefore it must be true. ... creationism is inherent in practical knowledge which they use every ... That common sense is much less common than you might expect ... They don't judge good and evil by their heart anymore, ...
    (talk.origins)