Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: wf3h <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:26:38 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 8, 7:31 am, "nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx"
<nando_rontel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whatever, you just substantiate everything I say.
- you make a science of good and evil by saying good and evil are in
the mind of people, instead of the spiritual realm, so to make good
and evil material things of a sort
tell you what...remove a person's brain (IOW make them a creationist)
see how much evil they do. the brain is material evil resides within
the brain. that's provable
- you continuously fight against any knowledge about freedom
- you discount the main intellectual opposition to racism throughout
history
which certainly wasn't religion. every single slave owner in US
history was a creationist.
Your opposition to racism is based on a lie, that there are no genetic
differences between people, and groups of people. Remember the
holocaust started out with killings of the mentally and physically
disabled. It is well possible that some of these disabilities were
based on genetics, although many of them were only thought to be based
on genetics, because the scientists could only think in terms of
physical cause and effect.
which has nothing to do with evolution. the fact some diseases are
genetic (Iike my own tourette's syndrome) has NOTHING to do with how
people view those diseases. you think my job has never been in
jeopardy because a boss viewed my genetic problem as a social issue?
you know nothing, ignorant creationist
Especialy for many mental diseases, just
like now in China, they cannot think that such may be because of a
lack of friends, or parents etc. simply because friendship and family
doesn't really figure in terms of cause and effect.
so nando lays the blame for genetic illnesses on the victim, rather
than blaming the CORRECT cause: genetics. next he'll tell us women
deserve breast cancer and MD patients deserve to die.
such is creationism
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- References:
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: shuttlt
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: wf3h
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: shuttlt
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: shuttlt
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: shuttlt
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: shuttlt
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- Prev by Date: Re: US creationists help islamist fanatics get crazier
- Next by Date: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
- Previous by thread: Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- Next by thread: Re: Aristotle rejects natural selection, and dislikes it's adherents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|