Re: What do Dawkins, Ham and Dembski have in common?
- From: John Wilkins <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:45:35 -0500
In article <hmtre5huau8iq5q6s0553hbinotd270cu2@xxxxxxx>, heekster
<heekster@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:05:48 -0400, John Wilkins <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Yeah, well the voltage was low with that one...
wrote:
In article <434pe5lv7rt2q4itj2aa5q5iijeufipvv9@xxxxxxx>, heekster
<heekster@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:22:33 -0700 (PDT), Ray MartinezMy supervisor, when I was a designer, thought they weren't. But he
<pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Supervisor and Designer are synonyms for God.
No.
They are not.
thought that "supervisor" alone was.
Even at low levels, power corrupts.
.
- References:
- Re: What do Dawkins, Ham and Dembski have in common?
- From: heekster
- Re: What do Dawkins, Ham and Dembski have in common?
- Prev by Date: Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
- Next by Date: Re: Chez Watt in the "misery enjoys company" category.
- Previous by thread: Re: What do Dawkins, Ham and Dembski have in common?
- Next by thread: Re: Shit 4 Brains, The **STATIC** evolutionist".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|