Re: Time too short for evolution?
- From: Roaming Rider <interested.reader37@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
On 12 Okt, 16:22, Ernest Major <{$t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
If I understand you correctly, your first statement claims that known
evolutionary processes *can't* account for the diversity and disparity
of terrestrial life.
Can't???
Did I write that? My understanding is that you quote "can't"
comprehend simple English properly, at least not see the distinction
between "strong case" and "can't".
/RR
Mysteries make me tick. What makes you tick?
/RR
--
alias Ernest Major
,
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time too short for evolution?
- From: Ernest Major
- Re: Time too short for evolution?
- References:
- Time too short for evolution?
- From: MY Ransom
- Re: Time too short for evolution?
- From: Roaming Rider
- Re: Time too short for evolution?
- From: Ernest Major
- Re: Time too short for evolution?
- From: Roaming Rider
- Re: Time too short for evolution?
- From: Ernest Major
- Time too short for evolution?
- Prev by Date: Re: Siphonophorae
- Next by Date: Re: Information DeLong might find useful
- Previous by thread: Re: Time too short for evolution?
- Next by thread: Re: Time too short for evolution?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
