Re: Y.O.O on Drugs.

Rich Mathers wrote:
On Sep 23, 5:44 am, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21 Sep, 14:08, Devils Advocaat <mankyg...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 21 Sep, 11:06, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
P.O.O for brains claims evolution is necessary for the development of
(get this)
***********************ALL****************************
modern drugs, because the animals (SO HE CLAIMS) they are tested on
are phylogenetically close to humans.
Can you show the title or provide a link to where Ye Old One actually
said this, because oddly enough when I search on Google the only time
this statement comes up is you opening this thread with it. I guess
that means you are making things up again, just to annoy the heck out
of people.
So I want to know
1) Why do we use rabbit's
What possession of the rabbit are you referring to?
2) Why is human antivenom derived from horses & not monkeys?
Which "human antivenom" are you referring to?
And when the debate heats up, I'll dig up some more examples of his
***STOOPIDNESS***.
You mean you will make a fool of yourself by lying again.
Stupid twit.

Trying to lie to cover his lies makes you look STOOPID, DISHONEST, and
GAY.

You are the very model of a Creationist Christian. Praise Jesus?

You are an atheist posting in t.o., pretending to have any knowledge of biology. Praise Darwin?




.

Relevant Pages