Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: alextangent <blog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 27, 7:34 am, Suzanne <leila...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 24, 7:58 pm, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suzanne wrote:
On Aug 24, 12:12 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Earle Jones wrote:
<snip>
*
Suzanne: Reading the above, I am trying to decide whether you are
telling us a big joke, are on some kind of dope, or just painfully
ignorant of science.
She is perfectly serious and saying she is ignorant of science
implies she might be able to learn.
Here is another of her explanations explaining what light is:
"These are all really the same thing, a stream
of photons that move at certain frequencies,
producing waves of energy, identifiable by
the speed at which they are moving. Your
ears "hear" the light when it is at a certain
level of speed in it's wave formed lengths.
Wehn it is faster, you see the light."
You probably were unaware that frequency is a speed and that light
has a "level of speed" down *and* can be heard.
This is not correct. This was about the entire
spectrum of electromagnetic radiations (EMR).
Each thing in it (Xrays, gamma rays, etc.) travels
at the speed of light, but in addition, each has a frequency as well,
and that is the number of
complete oscillations per second.
It is correct and that was a direct quote.
Here is the gibberish in context with the rest of it.
" Science tells us that light is a vast category in
which are things such as gamma rays, cosmic rays,
Xrays, and all those things that make up the
electromagnetic spectrum. Collectively they are
all called EMR. This is radiation energy that
travels and as it goes, it expands. These include
visible light, as well as invisible. It includes
microwaves, and even radio waves. These are all
really the same thing, a stream of photons that
move at certain frequencies, producing waves
of energy, identifiable by the speed at which
they are moving. Your ears "hear" the light
when it is at a certain level of speed in it's
wave formed lengths. Wehn it is faster, you
see the light. If you get a sunburn, which is
ultraviolet light, you feel the light. You can
heat up a cup of coffee in the microwave and
you can feel the heat that it generated."
Mike, this is not gibberish, this is the
ElectroMagnetic Radiation Spectrum. It is streams
of photons which travel at the speed of light, and
which are grouped by the frequencies that they
possess. Some of it you can't see, and some you
can see. You an see colors, but you can't see the
two colors called infrared and ultraviolet, but you
can see what they do. You also can't see Xrays,
cosmic rays, gamma rays, but they can be
detected. You can't hear radio waves, but you
can hear the radio receivers that use the energy
and frequencies of the radio waves. You can't see
an XRay, but you can see a picture of your bones
from what a machine can use of it's frequencies.
These are all the same thing: photons which travel
at the speed of light.
The original and now this are unadulterated gibberish. I love this
bit; "photons which travel at the speed of light". Fantastic. And (as
you've been told before) cosmic rays are not photons.
You are also interjecting your own sense of
mischief when you comment such as you did
about the presence of the word "hear," that is
within the sentence. That was meant to be a
sort of joke concerning what had been said,
and this has been explained to you several
times before, that it was put in quotes to notify
the reader that it is not referring to the actual
audible sound of something.
A claim you made repeatedly well after you posted it. Again, had it been the
only bit of stupidity in what you wrote that might be an excuse.
In context with the rest it clearly means what it says.
Mike, I've explained this to you several times,
but I didn't have to. I wanted to be kind to you.
You don't seem to have understood.
Phut. Look in the mirror.
She is also an expert on archeology.
"I don't know what others think, but I can tell you that
I feel an inner confirmation that it is the truth, so I
don't need outside archaeological evidence to prove to
me that it is true."
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:47:30 -0500
And you are not telling the truth here either.
That was not my philosphy about archaeology.
This answered someone's claim that a
Christian needed tangible proof that the Bible
is true. I was explaining that the Holy Spirit,
which indwells a believer can give an inner
confirmation.
That is a direct quote from you. If it is not true then you are the one who
lied about it.
Did you also lie about your conversations with god?
What is not true is your understanding, after someone
explains it to you. I've shown you above what this is
about.
The Bible says that Jesus says "My sheep hear
my voice." That's quite true, and it is scriptural.
This is possible because of the indwelling of the
Holy Spirit, which the Lord Jesus gives as a gift to
those who put their trust in him for salvation.
I'd rather an ingrowing toenail.
.
- References:
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Suzanne
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Suzanne
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Ilas
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Ilas
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Ilas
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Suzanne
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Ilas
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Suzanne
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Earle Jones
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Mike Painter
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Suzanne
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Mike Painter
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- From: Suzanne
- Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- Prev by Date: Re: I doubt your data.
- Next by Date: Re: test
- Previous by thread: Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- Next by thread: Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|