Re: Objective Anti-Intellectualism

On Aug 13, 10:00 am, tg <tgdenn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 13, 10:28 am, Kermit <unrestrained_h...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Aug 12, 4:10 pm, tg <tgdenn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Our direct perceptions, yes. but physics, for example, has theories -
models of reality - which not only make successful predictions but
which are *not intuitive, or even comprehensible without serious math
training.

The little physics I "know" is just a simple mental image I have in my
ape brain built on metaphors from pop science books and articles.

So what you say is certainly true about me and my inner construct of
the world, but science - using tools that require special training -
gives every indication that it is closing in on reality.

What indications would there be?  The only thing we can know is that
prediction is getting better.


Ummm... that *is the test for correctness in science, is it not? How
else would we know that we are closing in on reality?

Sure, we can say something like in GR that the math *is* the 'nature
of reality', properly dispensing with visualizations like 'curved
space-time'. But it is only 'the nature' of a perceptually defined
subset of what we perceive as 'phenomena' within the perceptually
defined 'universe'.

We already know of many phenomena that we cannot directly perceive:
Our brains give indications of deciding something before we are aware
of it.
The creation of particles that last only for nanoseconds.
Galaxies too far away to see with our eyes.
Viruses.
The Earth's magnetic field.
Heck, even gravity.

There are many things we cannot see directly, but because they have
effects on things we *can perceive, we can deduce their existence and
nature (to a degree).

Some of these things we think of as perceivable (microbes) but they
really aren't; other things are explicable only through high math or
other less intuitive means. Heck, my wife and I refer to some drivers
on the road as having "cat brains". Cats get run over frequently,
despite being superb athletes. Their brains did not evolve to process
sensory input for two-ton, 80 kph predators. They can catch birds on
the wing, but they get run over by cars they can see coming down the
road. I see people who obviously have no grasp of the distance they
can travel at highway speeds while processing the sight of an
accident, their physical reflex, and the braking time involved. They
"feel" safe when 3 meters behind someone while driving at 80 kph. Even
our interpretations of ordinary perceptions can be off.

There may be some things that interact with our perceptual realm so
little that we may not be able to get a handle on them. I don't see
this as a fundamental problem. Some things we may never know. That
doesn't mean that we know nothing, nor that we cannot learn much, much
more.


-tg


<snip>
Kermit

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: BBC Weather forecast
    ... > conscious brains are happy to continue believing it. ... > At the end of the day, reality is what we perceive it to be. ... > the cause is down to different perceptions in the first instance. ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: BBC Weather forecast
    ... conscious brains are happy to continue believing it. ... At the end of the day, reality is what we perceive it to be. ... of as reality is not something that's outside is, it's inside our brains. ... Unless we have some way of checking the veracity of our perceptions, ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Sample of my SR model"s interpretation
    ... perceptual reality acts like a 3-D hyperplane screen, ... It is no wonder that perceptions made by such ... traveling twin makes his journey, ... The ship's front end is seen by a stationary observer to have ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation
    ... > perceptual reality acts like a 3-D hyperplane screen, ... It is no wonder that perceptions made by such ... > conditions that hold for the traveling twin, ... to see what is `really' going on with the moving brother. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Science and God
    ... Newton's laws were just models of reality, ... Immediate perceptions are closer to reality ... Brain 1 might want ... though -- brain 1's store of experiences are physically closer to ...
    (uk.philosophy.humanism)
Loading