Re: ne more thing I want to show the courtroom and the public so

On Aug 1, 12:43 pm, Will in New Haven
<bill.re...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 1, 1:21 pm, Tapestry <estry....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jul 31, 12:40 pm, Kermit <unrestrained_h...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 31, 10:22 am, Picasso Renoir Hilton <ihavethecode...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Jul 31, 12:05 pm, Will in New Haven

<bill.re...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 31, 12:14 pm, Tapestry <estry....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 31, 10:23 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 31,  8:43 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 30, 3:01 pm, Ernest Major <{$t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.snipping photos

Now can you please provide the scientific name of the "common
ancestor" of man and reindeer?

It's quite likely that the remains of  organism that was the common
ancestor between those species has not yet been found and named.

So it only exists in reality in your head.

 It's
certain that such an organism lived.

It just had to even though the evidence doesn't fit at all.

Please repeat after me:

I am a member of darwin's cult.

I am a member of darwin's cult.

I am a member of darwin's cult.

I am a member of darwin's cult.

I am a member of darwin's cult.

I am a member of darwin's cult.

I am a member of darwin's cult.

http://www-hto.usc.edu/people/stavare/STpapers-pdf/SWTMM03.pdf

If you notice the wording here people, it is a bunch of double talk
that amounts to
everything is out of order and missing.

You believe nine impossible things before breakfast but you expect
your betters, which is everyone, to produce an unbreakable chain of
evidence, covering millions of years of evolution, or you will call
them cultists.

It is a wonder you can tie your shoes. If you can.

The missing link concept is a straw man.

You again don't know how to read.
I nowhere metioned the phrase "missing link".

Nowhere did you mention what the presumed problem was.

They want me to repeat it ad nauseaum when it is self evident.

Nor have you yet mentioned your own postion on these matters, or why
you think so.

You just throught that in there.

Yes. We are trying to make out the shapes of thoughts in a murky
cloud.
<squint harder>

Still nothing.

What I said was out of order.

Funny that I couldn't make any sense out of it then. I'm usually quite
good with out of order evasions and vague accusations.

Out of order out of sequence doesnt match doesnt fit.

IOW, the theory doesn't match the facts and that paper is the absolute
proof.

Which facts in this paper do you think present a problem for ToE?
The ToE has been modified many time (it is actually a group of related
theories), based on verified evidence. If this paper is correct, it
will improve the chronology of the fossil record, especially regarding
primates. How is that a problem?

The ToE doesn't match the facts.
THAT IS A FACT!

You seem to be claiming that science is in the process of getting more
accurate.

How is that a problem?

Yep it is more accurate now.
The theory of evolution doesnt fit match what we have found.
We know how Jehovah did it in his own wisdom, so you
would formulate the theory, so when the facts were finally assembled
into one
paper just a scant two years ago I would come along and point out
that Jehovah did it and didn't use evolution at all just in time for
his second coming.

Keep waiting, sucker.

--
Will in New Haven- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I want everyone to see his unstated goal.
To simply waste time so we all die and we have to go through this
all over again thousands of years from now.
He can't prevent anything, cant do anything about what is happening,
and
cant fix anything.
Simply wasting time so we all die is his only purpose.
Don't let him pull the wool over your eyes any longer ....
My job is to convince you of this and end the time of trouble.
Is there anybody out there with a brain and eyes?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Okimoto embarrasses himself by failing to recognize
    ... evolutionary biologists have found almost no testable, ... *divergent* connection from a last common ancestor. ... to see more similarity between the bonobo and common ... Evolution makes no claim for "progress". ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution is definately not a fact
    ... was that I produce evidence of creation. ... I vote no because if humans and chimps had the same ancestor then we ... evolution is not the cause of humans or chimps arising from the common ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Common Unknown Ancestor
    ... The fascinating story of man's evolution, ... > apes had a common unknown ancestor, ... monkeys is an unknown species, and will remain that way forever, because ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?
    ... What evidence do you have of this extraordinary claim that the ... Evolution does not do magical poofing. ... by crossing a large functionless gap.] ... pre-existing homology existed in the ancestor, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution is definately not a fact
    ... was that I produce evidence of creation. ... I vote no because if humans and chimps had the same ancestor then we ... evolution is not the cause of humans or chimps arising from the common ...
    (talk.origins)