Re: Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- From: "Greg G." <ggwizz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 18, 4:22 pm, Klaus Hellnick <khelln...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
backspace wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Secrets-Lost-Races-Discoveries-Civilizations/dp...
"Nuclear Warfare Among the "Primitives". Noorbergen's claim of nuclear
warfare in prehistoric times may seem preposterous to even an open-
minded reader, and his interpretation of ancient texts to be the
product of an overactive imagination, but as a matter of fact, it is
backed up by solid physical evidence. The following story ran on the
Cosmiverse website on June 13, 2000:
[Quote] From 1992 comes another fascinating, mysterious discovery:
that of an ancient city in India that appears to have leveled by an
atomic blast 8,000 - 10,000 years ago. Reported in January 1992 by the
UK's World Island Review, a construction team discovered the site in
Rajasthan, India while preparing to build at housing development.
The heavy layer of radioactive ash found in a three-mile-square area
concealed "an ancient city where evidence shows an atomic blast dating
back thousands of years, from 8,000 to 12,000 years, destroyed most of
the buildings and probably a half-million people. One researcher
estimates that the nuclear bomb used was about the size of the ones
dropped on Japan in 1945," said the newspaper.
After its discovery, the ancient city became suspect as the cause of a
high rate of birth defects and cancer in the region. "The levels of
radiation there (the city site) have registered so high on
investigators' gauges that the Indian government has now cordoned off
the region," said the newspaper.
Interestingly, the Indian Mahabharata appears to have recorded the
historic blast event. "A single projectile charged with all the power
in the Universe...An incandescent column of smoke and flame as bright
as 10,000 suns, rose in all its splendor...it was an unknown weapon,
an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death which reduced to
ashes an entire race," says the sacred text.
Archeologist Francis Taylor told the paper that etchings in some
nearby temples he has managed to translate suggest that they prayed to
be spared from the great light that was coming to lay ruin to the
city. "It's so mid-boggling to imagine that some civilization had
nuclear technology before we did. The radioactive ash adds credibility
to the ancient Indian records that describe atomic warfare." [End of
Quote]
Fallout contains mostly short lived isotopes, which is why it is
dangerous. It also means that it would have pretty much become safe
after around 10 years. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are now perfectly safe to
live in, after less than 60 years.
Do you suppose the fact that India performed their nuclear testing in
Rajasthan in the 1970's might account for the atomic ash?
.
- References:
- Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- From: backspace
- Re: Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- From: Klaus Hellnick
- Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- Prev by Date: yallo!
- Next by Date: Re: Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- Previous by thread: Re: Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- Next by thread: Re: Nuclear bombs used before the flood?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
