Re: Just LOOK at these pictures and THEN say there was NOT a Noah's

Kermit wrote:
On Jul 15, 11:31 am, "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmene...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:madman-uTk7m.23372$he4.13561@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Something sent this city cunder the water around 5,000 years ago. I
would say more like 6 to 10 thousand

"the lost culture of Mu, preserved in legend as the Motherland of
Civilization which perished in the sea long before the beginning of
recorded time."

THAT would be andeluvian period

http://members.toast.net/rjspina/Japan's%20Underwater%20Ruins.htm

AND

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/phikent/japan/japan2.html

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/phikent/japan/japan.html

Interesting. But the article doesn't cite a single scientific paper.
It
does quote one American geologist - Robert Schloch. A look
at Schloch's website convinces me he is something of a kook
and publicity hound. But his site does include some pictures
of the underwater Okinawan 'monument' which are just as
impressive as yours.

http://www.robertschoch.com/yonagunicontent.html

But notice what he writes:

As difficult as it may be for some to believe, after carefully
studying the Yonaguni Monument I have to report that I do
not believe it is an artificial, human-made structure. It is
indeed an absolutely incredible structure, and well worth
seeing, but I must conclude that, based on all of the evidence,
it is primarily a natural structure. The rocks of the region break
out neatly, both along horizontal and vertical planes, and
naturally form the step-like appearance. This is seen both
underwater and on the surface of Yonaguni.

So, having looked at the pictures, I still say there was no flood.

And even if there was a hundred-foot-or-so rise in sea level
associated with the end of the last ice age, and even if it
buried the cities of the ancestors of the folks who first wrote
down flood myths, that still doesn't mean that Noah built
a boat and filled it with lots of animals. And it is not evidence
that 5000 feet of sediment loaded with fossils collected at the
Grand canyon,

Hydrologically sorted levels of sediments, like the fossils
associated with them.

but no sediment at all collected at these ancient
submerged cities.

Why are you mad at God?


I'm curious as to whether you think that the rock UNDER these
submerged antediluvian cities contains fossils? If finding fossils
under them would be evidence (in your mind) that there was no
flood.

Because geologist Schloch says he found fossils - 20 million year
old fossils - in the rocks which you think of as constituting an
antediluvian pyramid.

In a last act of defiance against the god that was killing the, the
animals in the vicinity threw themselves under the city buildings as
they slid into the sea... And now, poor deluded fools such as you and
I, including those who think they are theists, are misled by the
fossils and their locations.

Kermit

There are other cities UNDER the water ya know. ---many of them

I think that fact bothers you and PIP


.

Loading