Delaney demonstrates what genuine blind faith is; Look see...

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:19:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim DeLaney
<delaney.timothy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 11, 5:21 pm, T Pagano <not.va...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:04:15 -0700, Kent Paul Dolan

<xanth...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
A real "Creator" would have had to start somewhere.

snip


God is omniscient, omnipotent and He Revealed that His creation was
"good" and not perfect.   None of these facts are new.  So either
Dolan is a dimwit or he couldn't care less about getting his facts
correctly or both.  I suspect it's both.

Oh, you assume your god is omniscient and omnipotent, and by this
assumption you conclude that you must be right.

It isn't my assumption it is what has been Revealed and taught for
2000 years. As a Christian I would be in a better position to offer
the Christian doctrine than that dimwit Dolan who barely gets his own
darwinian fairy tale correctly half the time.



Did it ever in your
entire life occur to you that you, being only human, may be wrong? Is
it impossible for you to err in your beliefs? Or is it your implicit
assumption that you are incapable of error?

My fallibility is irrelevent. The omniscience and omnipotence of God
was Revealed by Him as recorded in Scripture and taught beginning by
those with first hand knowledge of Jesus beginning almost 2000 years
ago.



Not only don't these nimrods atheists have an adequate knowledge base
of their own fairy tale they have no grasp of their competitor's
position.  This gives us the advantage.  It explains how only a few
creationists can hold back greater numbers including the academic
elitists like blowhard Okimoto.

Regards,
T Pagano

"...too easy drill sgt!!"

Tony, you have nothing but your blind belief in the supernatural to
argue from. No evidence, no reason or logic, just unreasoned belief
in a supernatural for which you can provide no evidence. Just because
you say you are free of error doesn't make it so.

But it is just the opposite of blind. We have direct eye witness
observation reports in Scripture of events that can only be the result
of Supernatural action. And those are a damn sight better than what
you have with your darwinian fairy tales of (for example) a mesonychid
(a small dog-like animal) transmogrifying into a whale---which is
virtually NOTHIN' but if-so stories.

Since we're dealing with unique, non repeating, non experimentally
reproducible events for both supernatural events and the darwinian
fairy tales circumstantial remnants and eye witness testimony is about
the best either of is going to do.

However it's obvious that Delaney is under the delusion that
scientists KNOW when, where, or how the first life appeared on earth.
Or that they have even one piece of evidence how novel biological
structures and systems emerge from non existence AND coherently
progress to maturity blindly. Recall from the NFL THEOREMS that
evolutionary searches are on average no better than a dumb, blind
search. The fossil record contradicts the ubiquitous emergence and
progressive development of novelty and Lenski's 40,000+ generation
experiment of E coli doesn't give one inch of help either.

If I am blind with real live eye witness reports what must that make
Delaney?

Regards,
T Pagano


Delaney leaves that perenial dimwit twisting in the wind.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Making money from Java
    ... > just have to pull out the original assumption that the being is omnipotent ... > omniscient, then that being could cause itself to become omniscient. ... > Perhaps part of what it has to do is speak with Judson. ... God before turning to Him in desperation. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Making money from Java
    ... >which don't contradict logic, then "God", if such a being exists, must ... >either not be omniscient, or not omnipotent. ... deity power inflation over the ages - which is useful to those who ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Christian Holidays
    ... > Rabid Weasel wrote: ... >>> An omnipotent, omniscient being created the man, with all the ... > an omnipotent, omniscient, loving God made this mess :-) ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design
    ... But it seems to me that "omnipotent" does not ... You are not as loving as God is supposed ... is virtue, and the best environment for attaining virtue is one where ... pleasant environment?, or (once one sees that the previous question is ...
    (uk.religion.christian)