Re: Take notice Keith (POTM seconded) Ron O is a double agent
- From: Dave Oldridge <doldridg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:38:27 GMT
Ray Martinez <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:4675abbb-85e9-412b-
8615-83d317eb2245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Jul 8, 1:10 pm, Tim DeLaney <delaney.timo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 7, 4:57 pm, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Logic says: Anytime a Christian accepts the same life production
theory that Richard Dawkins accepts the same is evidence that the
Christian is not a real Christian.
The above is pure drivel. See the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.
Tim
Rebuttal denies the magnitude of the logical absurdity of so called
Christians agreeing with the most fanatical Atheist against the Bible.
It is not the Bible, but your heretical interpretation of it that is
rejected. Oddly, the more militant atheists accept that your
misinterpretation is correct and use that as grounds to reject the Bible
outright.
Again, we believe Richard Dawkins is a real Atheist.
Dawkins is a real atheist. But creationists are rarely real Christians.
They are, instead, members of a Satanic hate cult.
They are very selective in the parts of the Bible they actually believe.
The part that says, "Thou shalt not bear false witness" they do not
believe.
I have seen Dawkins make some very illogical arguments about religion,
but I have never seen him lie about science. Creationist apologists do
that all the time as a matter of policy. They are not deemed heretics
for taking Genesis literally. They are heretics because they lie about
science (and about why they don't accept evolution). They are heretics
because they suborn sin in their followers.
That's heresy by definitions older than Christianity that the Church has
always accepted. When you are ready to confess and repent your sins of
false witness, God stands ready to forgive and accept you back into the
communion of saints. But, until that happens, you stand outside in the
darkness, cursing the light.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 454777283
.
- References:
- Is Ron O. Brain damaged?
- From: [M]adman
- Re: Is Ron O. Brain damaged (POTM)?
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Ron O. Brain damaged (POTM)?
- From: T Pagano
- Take notice Keith (POTM seconded) Ron O is a double agent
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Take notice Keith (POTM seconded) Ron O is a double agent
- From: Tim DeLaney
- Re: Take notice Keith (POTM seconded) Ron O is a double agent
- From: Ray Martinez
- Is Ron O. Brain damaged?
- Prev by Date: Re: Crackers and blasphemy
- Next by Date: Re: News: Americans favor science, but less than before.
- Previous by thread: Re: Take notice Keith (POTM seconded) Ron O is a double agent
- Next by thread: Re: Take notice Keith (POTM seconded) Ron O is a double agent
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|