Re: Dolan mistakenly concludes that methods to predict tumor growth

On Jul 5, 4:05 pm, r norman <r_s_nor...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:51:40 -0700 (PDT), hersheyh



<hershe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 5, 7:14 am, Ernest Major <{$t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message
<ceb2d587-f7ba-4707-ace4-a3d824f5f...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
hersheyh <hershe...@xxxxxxxxx> writes

The *real* dimwit would be the person who denies the fact that the
degree of identity in DNA sequences of modern humans and modern chimps
implies a closer genetic relationship than exist for any other two
currently living species.

I think you've misspoken. You appear to be claiming that humans and
chimpanzees are closer than any other pair of species. That is not true.
(Trivial counterexample - chimpanzees and bonobos.) I'm assume that is
not what you intended.

I was indeed only thinking about living organisms related to humans.

And what living organism is not related to humans  ;-)

[Tries to remove foot from mouth; sticks it in further.]
Ignore that man behind the screen with his foot in the odd position.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dolan mistakenly concludes that methods to predict tumor growth
    ... degree of identity in DNA sequences of modern humans and modern chimps ... implies a closer genetic relationship than exist for any other two ... I was indeed only thinking about living organisms related to humans. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dolan mistakenly concludes that methods to predict tumor growth
    ... degree of identity in DNA sequences of modern humans and modern chimps implies a closer genetic relationship than exist for any other two currently living species. ... You appear to be claiming that humans and chimpanzees are closer than any other pair of species. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: ABSURDITY -- Early Man Crossing BERING STRAIT
    ... >when it headed south. ... Just like the prepostrous theory that modern humans would spend ... Oh, that's right, they did and are still living there to this day. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: We are still evolving!
    ... do exactly the kind of calculation the authors of this ... Relax. ... No living being can fill in that blank, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: We are still evolving!
    ... do exactly the kind of calculation the authors of this ... Relax. ... No living being can fill in that blank, ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading