Re: vatican observatory

On Jul 1, 8:57 am, nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. J. Lodder) wrote:
Garamond Lethe <cartographi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-06-29, snex <x...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 29, 12:24 pm, Garamond Lethe <cartographi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-06-29, snex <x...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it is not compatible with science at all. science *never* says "if
some fact contradicts our theory, then our theory is still right, just
our understanding of it is wrong."

Facts don't exist in science.

that would be news to millions of scientists.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: vatican observatory
    ... "if some fact contradicts our theory, ... just our understanding of it is wrong." ... Facts don't exist in science. ... Millions of scientists are second-raters. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re GUY MACON
    ... >a vastly larger probability upon receipt of a degree. ... How can such an understanding be obtained? ... learn enough about the philosophy of science to count. ... The bad news is that everything is prohibited. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: vatican observatory
    ... some fact contradicts our theory, then our theory is still right, just ... Facts don't exist in science. ... the theory and knowing when you should toss the results. ... Einstein was quite competent at judging experiments. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: vatican observatory
    ... science. ... some fact contradicts our theory, then our theory is still right, just ... point out that you're *not* an authority. ... So if nobody gives a shit what I think, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: vatican observatory
    ... science. ... some fact contradicts our theory, then our theory is still right, just ... point out that you're *not* an authority. ... So if nobody gives a shit what I think, ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading