Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: Peter Rathmann <prathmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 22, 3:15 pm, Martin <usene...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Erwin Moller wrote:
And also, the 'degree' in Kelvin was only dropped (forbidden as you say)
in the sixies somewhere last century.
I don't think so. Kelvin has never been a 'degree' it's an absolute scale..
From the Wikipedia article:"Until the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) in
1967–1968, the unit kelvin was called a "degree", the same as with the
other temperature scales at the time. It was distinguished from the
other scales with either the adjective suffix "Kelvin" ("degree
Kelvin") or with "absolute" ("degree absolute") and its symbol was
°K."
But the whole discussion seems pedantic; it was clear in the original
post exactly what was meant and the inclusion of the 'K' did nothing
to confuse the meaning.
.
- References:
- Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: socratus
- Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: Erwin Moller
- Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: Erwin Moller
- Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- From: Martin
- Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- Prev by Date: A curious post in the Google Groups Help Forum
- Next by Date: done deal, cope re: In spite of dinosaurs evolving to birds being
- Previous by thread: Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- Next by thread: Re: Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|