Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- From: Kermit <unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 12, 12:32 am, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerard71 wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:15 am, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
""Fascinating confluence of different misunderstandings here. Madman
and
Gerard both have no clue, but in quite different ways. Gerard seems
to
think that natural selection doesn't exist, and all evolution is
drift.
Madman seems to think that natural selection doesn't exist, and all
evolution is multiple, directed mutations.""
No, I stated in my post that certain key regulators in each successive
generation would utilize (or not) the newly accessible traits (from
genetic drift). The selection processes don't even come into play here
because my argument is (as is Adman's) that they wouldn't have such
"convenient" new data to select. These are errrors according to
science, not carefully sequenced bits of info as by a designer. Throw
this evolution argument out now, its rediculous! Now was life designed
this way? Of course!
Exactly.
No, not even approximately.
Kermit
.
- References:
- Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- From: Gerard
- Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- From: [M]adman
- Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- From: Gerard71
- Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- From: [M]adman
- Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- Prev by Date: Re: Discovery Institute Coven filed fraudulent DMCA take-down notices
- Next by Date: Re: Creation Museum's Attendance Exceeds Expectations By Far
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution: Survival of the Miss-est
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading