Re: David Klinghoffer: James von Brunn, Evolutionist

On Jun 11, 5:40 pm, Jason Spaceman <notrea...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From the article:
----------------------------------------------
Now isn't this fascinating. James von Brunn, the white-supremacist suspect in
today's Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting in which the guard who was shot has
now tragically died, describes the relevance of evolution to his sick thinking.

Not really. He describes a mish-mash of contradictory ideas common
among American racists, most based on the racial theories of
creationists like Louis Agassiz rather than based on Darwinian
evolution. The key ideas of Agassiz are the *fixity* of species and
that different human races are actually *created* as independent,
genetically isolated groups that should remain separate. Often blacks
(and Jews and any other non-Aryan group, like Italians) are considered
(as did Agassiz) different *species*. Although they may invoke natural
selection (usually in the form of 'survival of the fittest'), they
never describe human races as a bush of equally evolved end points.
Instead they invoke the idea of a ladder or scale of progress with
their disfavored group living on a lower rung. Scala natura ideas are
*pre-Darwinian*.

He's obsessed with "genetics."

And botches that just as badly as he botches everything else.

He writes in his manifesto (emphasis added):

    Approval of inter-racial breeding is predicated on idiotic Christian dogma
that God's children must love their enemies (a concept JEWS totally reject);

In humans, inter-racial breeding has occurred whenever and wherever
two human populations meet. This has not always been a matter of
choice (particularly on the part of the females). Rape is and has
been a common form of inter-racial breeding among soldiers, slave-
owners, and priests. I presume that the racist objection is strongest
when the 'inter-racial' breeding actually is the result of "love"
rather than a disparate power relationship (with the racist's favored
group on top in the Missionary position).

and
on LIBERAL/MARXIST/JEW propaganda that all men/races are created equal.

No men/races are *created*. They evolved from common ancestors.

These
genocidal ideologies, preached from the American pulpits, taught in American
schools, legislated in the halls of Congress (confirming TALMUDIC conviction
that goyim are stupid sheep), are expected to produce a single,
superintelligent, beautiful, non-White "American" population. Eliminating
forever racism, inequality, bigotry and war. As with ALL LIBERAL ideologies,
miscegenation is totally inconsistent with Natural Law:

Which shows that he has no idea what Natural Law is.

the species are improved
through in-breeding, natural selection and mutation.

Inbreeding produces monocultures and, often, reveals genetic defects.
Inbreeding often leads to extinction. But races are not species.

Only the strong survive.

Depends. In some Carib tribes there is a high incidence of albinism.
The strong non-albino men go fishing for weeks at a time. The weak
albino men are left behind with the women. Again, *any* even cursory
examination would recognize that luck also plays a role and that
personal survival is irrelevant to the evolutionary mechanism.

Cross-breeding Whites with species lower on the evolutionary scale diminishes
the White gene-pool while increasing the number of physiologically,
psychologically and behaviorally deprived mongrels.

At most, there can be a "white" difference in allele frequency. There
no significant difference in the "gene-pool" of any human race (we all
share the same genes, but there are frequency differences in the
alleles of those genes -- with very few alleles that are even race-
limited and none that can uniquely identify 'race').

There is also no "evolutionary scale"; that is a pre-Darwinian
concept. And "mutts" are often healthier and less odd than pure-bred
dogs.

Throughout history
improvident Whites have miscegenated. The "brotherhood" concept is not new (as
LIBERALS pretend) nor are the results -- which are inevitably disastrous for the
White Race -- evident today, for example, in the botched populations of Cuba,
Mexico, Egypt, India, and the inner cities of contemporary America.

This wacko despises Christianity, too, though not quite as much as he does
Judaism. Like Hitler in Mein Kampf, he draws lessons from his interpretation of
Darwinism.

Like Hitler, he is stuck in the early 20th century genetic ideas that
produced eugenics (often of a non-racial variety advocated by many
progressives and religious groups in America).

He's very big on dangers to the Aryan "gene pool." The subtitle of
his book promies: "A New Hard-Hitting Exposé Of The JEW CONSPIRACY To Destroy
The White Gene-Pool."

Other thoughts in this pseudo-scientific vein:

    Our Founding Fathers were Aryans, men of good breeding who understood,
empirically, the great differences existing between strains of horses;

Actually, although some of our Founding Fathers were slave-owners, the
most important of them did recognize the conflict between slavery and
the ideals they held. George Washington in particular, but also
Thomas Jefferson. Others, like Franklin and, clearly, John Adams,
were not slave-owners and did not agree with that strange institution.

strains
of live-stock; races of men; and between individuals: knowledge confirmed today
by the natural sciences of Genetics, Eugenics, and Anthropology. Hitler, as
American boobs are beginning to learn, was not all wrong.

Of course not. He was right about the weakness of Chamberlin. He
was, however, as ignorant about genetics and evolution as David
Klinghoffer is.

Also this:

    [T]o the astonishment of the world, Chancellor Adolph Hitler, who emphasized
genetics and the homogeneity of the Aryan race, led Germany to an amazing
spiritual and economic recovery.

No, he doesn't cite Darwin by name in the part of his book that's readable
online -- the first 6 of 12 chapters.

Maybe Klinghoffer has the ability to stomach 6 whole chapters of
biological nonsense because he actually thinks it makes some sort of
sense and has some relationship to real biology. I don't.

But do you get the general drift? And you
want to tell me that ideas don't have consequences?

Yes. Tell that to the right-wing creationist nuts and so-called
pundits like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh that feed fuel to the
political ideologies of neo-Nazis, racists, and people who think that
a n****r socialist muslim president is the end of the "real America".

------------------------------------------------

Read it athttp://blog.beliefnet.com/kingdomofpriests/2009/06/james-von-brunn-
evolutionist.html orhttp://tinyurl.com/m28lgt

J. Spaceman

.

Relevant Pages

  • Anthropology assistant professor uncovers genetic patterns
    ... to genetics but linguistics. ... which was recently published in the American Journal ... research in South America suggests the ... He said his data shows local populations in the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Race and IQ
    ... Sub-Saharian Africans while Europeans and American aborigens belong to ... might be interesting for purposes of medical genetics, ... IQ scores of children or adults living in underdeveloped countries are ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Coastal colonisation
    ... S Wang cs.2007 PLoS Genetics ... We examined genetic diversity and population structure in the American ... individuals representing 24 Native American populations sampled from North, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)