Re: prime mover

Chris wrote:
On Jun 7, 6:47 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris wrote:
On Jun 7, 4:11 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris wrote:
On Jun 6, 5:52 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris wrote:
On Jun 6, 12:48 am, Dale <inva...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Representational realism states that we do not (and cannot)
perceive the
external world as it really is; instead we know only our ideas
and interpretations of the way the world
is.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_realism

This said, any belief in cause and effect, including evolution,
must have
originated by a first cause or prime mover.

--
Dale

God is dietary fiber?

No, but gotta follow his food laws

I prefer the FDA's, thank you.

Chris

THAT is not complete enough for the body.

Their recomendations are for the "Minimum Daily Allowances"

Sometimes your body will need more of a specific nutrient.

The Old Testament's dietary laws consist not of nutritional
guidelines but of arbitrary restrictions on what can or cannot be
eaten. The FDA says certain things cannot be eaten but that's based
on reality, not a faked fax from God. What the Bible says cannot be
eaten is not based on reality; it is fantasy, and I pay no
attention to it. It's the musings of Bronze Age bone rattlers who
probably ate a bad clam sometime. That being said, while I think it
is indeed silly, if others want to follow those rules, more power
to them. If you want to follow those rules at certain times of the
Lunar Year, more power to you. That means cheaper crab and shrimp
for me.

Do YOU follow those rules? When did you last eat pork, shrimp,
clams, oysters, mussels, scallops or any of the other banned foods?

Chris

Are you trolling me Chris? A "faked fax from God"? Now..THAT was
funny.

And "Yes". I follow the rules. All of God's rules are good rules to
live and eat by.

PORK and the fat from the pork will kill ya man. Pigs do not sweat.
They retain all of the toxins they consume over their life time IN
their meat and IN their fat.

Ridiculous. You had your ass handed to you when you made that
assertion weeks ago and nothing has changed. Sweat is not a toxin-
disposal system. You do not excrete toxins when you sweat.

Lie Lie Lie. And you most certainly did not /hand my/ ass to me

The skin is known as the third kidney. Sweating removed toxins from the body

"Exercise as often as you can to rid your body of toxins. Your body rids
toxins from it through your sweat. Try sitting in a sauna, which is also
great for sweating out those toxins
http://www.ehow.com/how_2318084_remove-toxins-from-body.html

Obviously, in order to ride your body of toxins, they have to come out
somewhere from your body. One of the methods that is generally used is
sweating it out. That is one of the main reasons for using a steam room. You
just go in there and sweat all of the bad toxins out through your skin.
http://www.epinions.com/review/Internal_Cleansing_Rid_Your_Body_of_Toxins_and_Return_to_Vibrant_Good_Health_by_Linda_Berry/content_169767112324


Any seafood that does not have fins and scales are bottom feeders.

I handed you your head on that assertion months ago. You obviously
have never even seen a live marine organism, let along observed it
feeding. Shrimp, for example, live all through the water column and
are not bottom feeders. While lobster and crab move along the
substrate (often reefs, not the ocean bottom) they are not scavengers;
they are predators. Learn some freaking biology before you make half-
assed statements.


Bottom feeding invertebrates include shellfish, crabs, crayfish, sea
anemones, starfish, snails, bristleworms and sea cucumbers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_feeder

Is shrimp a shell fish? Why YES, it is.


`+Do you
LIKE eating something that eats *** off of the bottom of the ocean
floor?

Do you eat sole? Flounder? Those are bottom feeders, and are generally
thought to be some of the best-tasting fish available.

Sorry. I eat nothing that eats the crap off the bottom. YOU can if you want
to



Why yes....THAT would be you

Well, I guess it's better to eat the thing that eats the ***, than to
be the *** itself. That would seem to be you.

Insults are all that is left ladies and gentelmen.


Disease is generally caused by a lack of a specific nutrient.

Bacteria. Viruses. Gene disorders. Those cause the majority of
disease. Nutrient deficiencies are well known and easily treated.
You, for example, sound very much like a long-term pellagra sufferer.


Tobacco itself
does not cause lung cancer; But the nutrients that are robbed from
the body

You ficking idiot. What are you trying to say here? The carcinogens in
tobacco are well known. Increasing your antioxidant intake if you
smoke IS a good idea but it won't prevent cancer. If you've got a
particular set of oncogenes, you're more likely to get lung cancer.
You are a dangerous fool spouting crap that is totally wrong, and in
fact life-threatening.

stemming from it's use does. THAT is why some can smoke for 30, 40
years, even a life time and never get cancer while some die in as
little as 10 years from smoking.

No, it's because some people are genetically more susceptible. And are
you going to assert that emphysema and stroke stemming from tobacco
use are nutritionally related? You're retarded.

(New Age fake science BS claptrap snipped).

Shut the *** up before you hurt someone. You're an irresponsible
jerk.

Chris

.

Loading