Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the
- From: wf3h <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 15:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 4:01 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Jun 6, 5:28 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Look at the oceans with Google earth. Imagine (if you can) water
being only in the deep dark blue areas; and not very deep in those
areas at that. See all of those possible land bridges? You can
almost walk around the earth. Even to Hawaii. Now imagine an earth
with a water vapor canopy as well as water much under the ground. So
much water under the ground in fact that the earth was fed by
fountains and mist, not rain. Just as described IN the bible. THAT
would be more then enough to flood the earth then run off into the
lighter areas in the oceans.
there was no water canopy. and what is the kinetic energy released by
enough water to flood the earth in 40 days? creationists have all
kinds of problems with their 'ideas'.
It only RAINED for 40 days. The fountains of the deep flooded the earth for
an additional 4 months. The flood took 6 months. NOT a year. Noah stayed on
the boat the additional time as God instructed which equaled approx. a year
and where's the mass balance equation that shows the model of how this
happened? we physicists, chemists, and engineers would never make such
a statement absent a calculation showing:
1. where the water came from
2. how much water was involved
3 how much energy was expended in delivering the water to earth
4. where the water went after the waters abated
this is simple 1st law of thermodynamics stuff that every freshman
should be able to do.
so do it. where's the model?
the fact that creationists have been unable to provide such an answer
to simple questions leads one to think their concepts have no
value...IOW creationism is useless.
which is what i've been saying all along.
.
- References:
- The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the biblical flood
- From: Jason Spaceman
- Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the biblical flood
- From: John Smith
- Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the biblical flood
- From: Jim Willemin
- Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the biblical flood
- From: [M]adman
- Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the
- From: wf3h
- Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the
- From: [M]adman
- The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the biblical flood
- Prev by Date: Re: life before Charmin
- Next by Date: Re: Evangelist to talk
- Previous by thread: Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the
- Next by thread: Re: The science of Noah's Ark: Creation society considers the
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading