Re: ok
- From: reddfrogg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 14:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
On May 31, 2:21 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Boikat wrote:..
The teens are being fed a line of crap IMHO. They get an "A" in crap
and I get an "F" in crap. No biggie for me. Big problem for the kids
of course.
You opinion is worthless, since it's based upon ignorance.
Yours of course being an opinion based on ignorance.
He seems to be accurate in this case, however.
What happens when one fruit fly does not mate with another? That
simply don't mate. THAT's what. There are females that /*I*/ will
refuse to mate with based on the type and amount of food they eat
too. <G>
No doubt there are a lot of females that feel teh same way about you.
A major point that flies over your pointy little head is that *you*
are not a species.
Science disagrees with ya pal.
Where does science say an individual is a species?
ot fruit flies in the end; not a new
species. Oh sure, you /could/ say they are now a different "kind" of
fruit fly. But the thing is, They are still a fruit fly. Until the
thing changes into a cat or something else that is clearly no longer
a fruit fly you still have a fruit fly albeit cannot mate with the
other fruit fly.
Your ignorance is showing again. If you have a population of fruit
flies that does not breed with the parent population, it is a new
species of fruit fly. That has been explained to you, but obviously
you are too stupid to understand that basic point. Your stupidity and
ignorance is not a problem for the ToE.
It is STILL a fruit fly moron. Get it? Of course not
What else does it have to be? It's a new species of fruit fly.
That's what's evolution predicts, not that a fruit fly is going to
turn into a cat, or any other mammal.
when dogs get to a
point where they can no longer mate successfully with a wolf what
will you have? you will still have a "kind" of animal that
originally came from the wolf family named dog. Only it can no
longer breed with it's great ancestor. When the dog stops breeding
with the wolf it has not changed into a fruit fly. Here is the
important part, It is still a dog which is after his own kind "the
wolf". Which just so happens to be how the bible explains it. In a
strait line; after his own kind. Let them populate the earth "After
his own kind".
All species are slave to their genetic history, and whether you like
it ore not, sopeciation occures, and speciation is the result of
biological evolution, whether you like it or not.
Please learn to spell it first
Kettle/pot moment.
You are unqualified to grade anyone's logic abilities.
THAT would be you
t an "F" in understanding the
animal kingdom from a biblical perspective.
The "biblical perspective" is irrelevent to modern biology.
That is right. But it makes it no less accurate
erned about THAT.
The 'biblical perspective" has nothing to do with science. Science
isn't required to tiptoe lightly around people's religious
prejudices.
I would hope that you would be concerned in a parochial school,
because if you were i a teacher in the public school system, and
spouted your religious ignorance, I sue your ignorant ass, and the
school district.
Because we need all perspectives presented to
make indivdual choices based on knowledge and full disclosure.
Does that include all perspectives in Sex Ed? For some reason you
spineless assholes that advocate "teach them every aspect, including
creatardism" seem to crawl back into your sewer when I ask about that.
ption of being informed about
alternative sexual lifestyles? Don't you think they can make their
own decisions with regards to sex? If's it's good enough for them to
"pick and choose" their science, then it would be just as important
that they be able to pick and choose when it comes to sex ed, don't
you think? (okay, that last question contains the concept of 'don't
you think?" and was asked of adman, and the onswer is "no", but there
it is.)
Teach them everything. Let them decide. Now what.
Why should children be allowed to "decide" what is the truth or
not? Do children get to decide that cookies are nutritious, or that
drain cleaner is a tasty snack?
DJT
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: raven1's bluff is called; raven1 claims that t.o posts from creationists exist showing that Scripture is used as Science;
- Next by Date: Re: raven1's bluff is called; raven1 claims that t.o posts from
- Previous by thread: Re: ok
- Next by thread: Re: ok
- Index(es):
Loading