Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: "*Hemidactylus*" <ecphoric@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
On May 25, 10:13 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Friar Broccoli wrote:Misplaced personification. You are reifying science into an entity and
On May 25, 3:03 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mitchell Coffey wrote:
On May 25, 2:05 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Friar Broccoli wrote:
On May 25, 1:00 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"A pair of Albany teenagers suspended for "gang-related behavior"
because they were wearing crucifixes say they were only wearing
gifts from their mothers. Jaime Salazar, 14, his friend Marco
Castro, 16, were suspended from South Albany High School recently
after they refused to put away the crucifixes they were wearing
around their necks.Salazar said Principal Chris Equinoa saw his
necklace and told him to put it away. "I was like, why?" Salazar
said. "He says it's related to gangs.""
"The school district backs him up."
However:
"Bud Bunce, spokesman for the Roman Catholic archdiocese of
Portland, said his office has received no reports of gangs using
crucifixes or rosaries to identify themselves. The archdiocese
represents Catholic churches in Oregon west of the Cascades, from
the California border to the Washington border."
http://www.liberalwhiners.com/2008/02/25/school-suspends-teens-for-we...
It seems the origins of religious intolerance abound everywhere
these days Spiny. Even when they have to MAKE UP! the reasons.
.
Or the mothers that made the rosary were in the gangs.
Maybe. Do you know of any gangs that have murdered more people
than the Catholic Church?
Yeah. Science.
140,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki with much more
dead from the residual effects stemming from the use of the
scientific discovery of the atom as a bomb.
8,000- 10,000 died within 72 hours, and it is estimated that 25,000
have since died from gas-related diseases in India.
Countless others dead from the result of smaller chemical spills
and nuclear accidents over the last 50 years. All directly related
to scientific discovery.
Not to mention the death toll that has been realized from the
invention of guns and gun powder. In the billions i am sure.
now what
Is it your utter lack of morals that keeps you from actually looking
up what really happened?
Yeah. I looked up the invention of the gun. Then i looked up how
many people have been killed by guns.
The resulting deaths by guns was "what really happened".
There is a wide conviction that ignorance of this level isn't
possible; thus the common conclusion that you are merely trolling.
Yet, creationists routinely evince this level of ignorance and
amorality, and when you appear to open up and reveal your true self
you appear no more intelligent or moral.
.
Did you care to address the fact that science has killed more people
then the Catholic Church? Or were you just trolling?
You are correct of course.
Improved agricultural production and medical care have
allowed a HUGE increase in the number of people, all
of whom have or will die.
Science it truly awful.
Yeah, science invents way to feed people so it can kill them latter with a
nuclear bomb.
treating it as if it had its own intentions or agendas. People have
used science to develop better food industry technologies that have
fed people and has led to a higher standard of living for many people
throughout the world. This has inadvertently led to higher population
densities and death by microbial diseases, homicide, stress and
obesity related medical conditions. The rule of unintended
consequences rears its head.
People have used science and are still suing science to develop
nuclear technology to kill others. Ironically North Koreans are more
concerned with blowing up their enemies with a nuclear missile than
they are feeding their own people. Or maybe they are using nuclear
blackmail, instead of their own food technologies, to extort food from
other nations.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: [M]adman
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- References:
- PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: [M]adman
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: Friar Broccoli
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: [M]adman
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: Mitchell Coffey
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: [M]adman
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: Friar Broccoli
- Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- From: [M]adman
- PART2. Religious discrimination
- Prev by Date: Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- Next by Date: Re: So what was it this time?
- Previous by thread: Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- Next by thread: Re: PART2. Religious discrimination
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading