Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:21:32 -0400
"Ernest Major" <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Switch89 <Ryansarcade@xxxxxxxxx> writes?>> mutating without killing the organism.
"Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmene...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2. The reason why a universal code seemed more likely to Crick
under the hypothesis of directed panspermia is that Crick thought
that an Earth-derived LUCA would be primitive and would have
a code which wasn't used for many proteins. Whereas he thought
that a code which came from bacteria designed by aliens would
be a mature and frozen code, which would not be capable of
[snip]
... On the other hand, what if the
first living thing (not the LUCA) used just a few (say 8-10) amino
acids and then the use of the other amino acids evolved separately in
different lineages? Then the code would be deeply similar, but not
exactly the same.
That's possible. It may even have happened, and the variants been lost
over time. But not all amino-acids are equally suitable for addition at
a particular place in the genetic code, so there would be a tendency for
parallelism to occur in substitutions. (As has happened in the
development of the variant codes from the code of the LUCA.)
Do you have a cite for that? That parallel (convergent) evolution
took place in the evolution of variations on the universal code?
But if aliens seeded life from space, the code would
use 20 or so amino acids and be fully developed. Is that what you're
saying? That makes sense to me. Thanks!
Yep, that is basically what I was suggesting. You are welcome.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: Ernest Major
- Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- References:
- Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: Switch89
- Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: Switch89
- Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- From: Ernest Major
- Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- Prev by Date: Re: yeah. riiiight!!
- Next by Date: Re: Young Earth Creationist Arguments. Do they realize how they look?
- Previous by thread: Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- Next by thread: Re: Directed Panspermia and Common Descent
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|