Re: Young Earth Creationist Arguments. Do they realize how they look?


"TomS" <TomS_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:252127120.000028df.082.0001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:26:22 +1000, in article
<1izm5e4.1cp9i8g1ghnqmwN%john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John S. Wilkins
stated..."
[...snip...]
Since the early years of the church, it has been understood that
God's
creation need not happen all in a single instant. Actually there's
this
old book that suggests this is the case. Gene-something?


I needn't remind John that there are many moderns who think that
their particular interpretation of the Bible, conditioned as it
is by many cultural movements over recent centuries, somehow is
the one that has been held to from ancient times, as well as being
the only correct one. It has long struck me as being amazing that
someone belonging to a relatively small (say, less than 1% of
contemporary Christians) group of recent origins (less than 25% of
the Christian era) can think that their interpretation is normative
for all of Christianity.

For example, the idea that the Bible tells us of the creation, not
of *things* (such as animals and plants), but of categories of
things (such as populations, species, or even kinds) is a quite
modern innovation which takes a lot of imagination to find in the
Bible. Maybe it's right, but I think that I'd be looking for some
evidence for it being right.

There is nothing wrong with you having an
inquiring mind. Nothing at all. But what
happens when some of us take things on faith,
is that we have become aware of the presence
of the Lord actually being there. You know,
I can only tell someone about this, but the way
you are convinced is when you, yourself, feel
his presence and his nudging you to trust him.

One doesn't have to read very extensively in the early Christians
to find a range of opinions of how long creation takes. Even such
an early work as the Epistle of Barnabas (somewhere late 1st or
early 2nd century) has the "day"="thousand years" interpretation.

I hope that I have not confused you by mentioning
this phrase of a day with the Lord as being as a
thousand years, but what I was meaning to say is
that what we see through science as being billions
of years may not be really what it is. But I'm going
to tell you the best argument for your side. It's that
light takes so long to reach us and what the Hubble
Telescope sees when probing it's eye into deep
space is the light that was so far away that it is just
now reaching us. That is what is the most outstanding
evidence for an older universe. However, is what
we think we are seeing really taking so long to reach
us because of billions of years, or is the medium
through which it is traveling slowing it down in
some way? With our finite brains we conclude
of course it took millions of years. Einstein believed
at one point that space wrapped around itself like a
spiral. We only think of light as traveling to us in a
straight path. But maybe it's a curved path and we
don't know it. Can light travel to us on a curve?

I have a question. If the world is 40 billion years
old, can we point a telescope into deep space and
see the earth with the light of it just now reaching
us, and still see it's image as it was when it was
new?

Suzanne

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Young Earth Creationist Arguments. Do they realize how they look?
    ... , Suzanne stated..." ... I needn't remind John that there are many moderns who think that ... For example, the idea that the Bible tells us of the creation, not ... One doesn't have to read very extensively in the early Christians ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Young Earth Creationist Arguments. Do they realize how they look?
    ... <1izm5e4.1cp9i8g1ghnqmwN%john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John S. Wilkins stated..." ... the Christian era) can think that their interpretation is normative ... For example, the idea that the Bible tells us of the creation, not ... One doesn't have to read very extensively in the early Christians ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Theistic Evolutionists dont "accommodate" they subvert
    ... Evolutionists readily admit that they exclude even the possibility of ... IDers dismiss them as ?accomodationists.? ... CHRISTIANS, as opposed to creationist heretics, base our doctrines ... accept the science of evolution to be in error about special creation. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize, FatAss Limbaugh busts his pus-filled gut.
    ... They believe that man was given dominion over the earth, that the earth was given to them to use. ... An Evangelical Declaration on the Care of Creation ... Because in Christ God has healed our alienation from God and extended ... Therefore we call upon all Christians to reaffirm that all creation is ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize, FatAss Limbaugh busts his pus-filled gut.
    ... earth, that the earth was given to them to use. ... An Evangelical Declaration on the Care of Creation ... Because in Christ God has healed our alienation from God and extended ... Therefore we call upon all Christians to reaffirm that all creation is ...
    (soc.retirement)