Re: Try this

On Tue, 12 May 2009 22:33:11 -0500, "[M]adman" <adman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:

unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 12, 11:37 am, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remove "The Theory Of Evolution" from the science classrooms. After
all, it is not really a *science.

Yet strangely enough, the scientists think so.

you would expect them not to?


Put it in a class that teaches all of the other theories regarding
the origins of mankind.

There aren't any other theories.

Unless you've come up with one? Remember, in order to be science, the
data msut be verifiable, and the model must make specific predictions
(which makes it testable).

Got one?

do you?

Not really, because evolution is not really a theory.

Liar!



Present all sides in an objective manor.

The only alternatives aren't science.

Neither is evolution

Liar!

So everything will be on equal footing


Problem solved.


A. Creationism wiped out smallpox from the face of the Earth, using
insights from the book of Genesis.
B. Creationism developed the germ theory of disease, using insights
from the book of Genesis.
C. Creationism built the Hubble Space Telescope, using insights from
the book of Genesis.
D. Creationism develops the current flu vaccine every year, using
insights from the book of Genesis.

Answer: none of the above.

A. EVOLUTION wiped out smallpox from the face of the Earth, using
insights from the book of Genesis.
B. EVOLUTION developed the germ theory of disease, using insights
from the book of Genesis.
C. EVOLUTION built the Hubble Space Telescope, using insights from
the book of Genesis.
D. EVOLUTION develops the current flu vaccine every year, using
insights from the book of Genesis.

None of the above. It seems once again that you want to lend scientific
creditability to an idea that is not all that scientific. i.e. evolution

Liar!



Let the students decide what resonates to them and makes more sense.

Bwahahahaha!
Nice.

This should go over well in history, algebra, and chemistry, also.

"Every child left behind".

you mean: Every child put first to choose




Or perhaps the proponents of evolution afraid?

Yeah. I'm afraid that your grandkids will be polyglots. They'll be
able to say "Do you want fries with that?" in Swedish, Japanese,
Mandarin, or Indonesian. Or perhaps they can do little religious
rituals on the side of the road for the cameras, and pick up tips that
way.

In the meanwhile, the scientists will just have to wade thru the
mountains of research papers published by Creation scientists in the
last few years. Oh, wait.

Look. Evolution is not science.


Liar!

Why do you try to associate an unproven
theory with real science?

Because it is very good science.

I am sure there are real scientists around the world that get very angry
when you do this.

Liar!


Kermit
--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Try this
    ... Yet strangely enough, the scientists think so. ... Remember, in order to be science, the ... insights from the book of Genesis. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Try this
    ... Yet strangely enough, the scientists think so. ... Remember, in order to be science, the ... Creationism wiped out smallpox from the face of the Earth, ... insights from the book of Genesis. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Try this
    ... If it weren't science, yes. ... evolution were wrong, half the sciences would be also. ... insights from the book of Genesis. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Try this
    ... If it weren't science, yes. ... evolution were wrong, half the sciences would be also. ... insights from the book of Genesis. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Was the Garden of Eden actually in the Sunni Triangle?
    ... debate is whether Creationism is a science. ... The things that you are so flippant about are all things that are part ... Scientists investigate things. ... If one can't investigate the physical aspects of Genesis, ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading