Re: Further proof of Design.
- From: "[M]adman" <adman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 21:10:49 -0500
Ernest Major wrote:
:: In message <pujNl.38943$9a.20772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "[M]adman"
:: <adman@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
::: The seed. THATS right. The seed.
:::
::: The seed has a duel purpose.
:::
::: The seed can be a nutritious food, or, the seed can be planted to
::: make more seeds.
:::
::: Clearly a design for efficiency. Anyone that cannot see this has
::: zero perception.
:::
:::
:: I take it that you haven't considered the toxicity of the seeds of,
:: for example, the rosary pea (Abrus precatorius), or the castor bean
:: (Ricinus communis), or the bitter almond (Prunus amygdalus), or the
:: deadly nightshade (Atropa belladonna). In all these cases the seeds
:: are highly toxic.
:: --
:: alias Ernest Major
A hand full out of millions
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Further proof of Design.
- From: Ernest Major
- Re: Further proof of Design.
- References:
- Further proof of Design.
- From: [M]adman
- Re: Further proof of Design.
- From: Ernest Major
- Further proof of Design.
- Prev by Date: Re: Further proof of Design.
- Next by Date: Re: Further proof of Design.
- Previous by thread: Re: Further proof of Design.
- Next by thread: Re: Further proof of Design.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
