Re: Finnish Genes Part 2 [it just keeps getting better]

On May 3, 2:44 pm, "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Smith wrote:
:: "[M]adman" <ad...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

::news:kEjLl.36612$v8.4368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[\] snip usual bullshit nonsense from the obviously unedcuated..

::: In part 1 I showed that genetic mutation cannot cause evolution but
::: would cause an isolated population to go extinct instead. Now in
::: part 2 I will show that natural selection cannot cause
::: macro-evolution either.
:::
::: <quote>
::: Studies in Finland show evidence that: "754 twins born between 1734
::: and 1888 in five towns in rural Finland, girls from mixed-gender
::: pairs proved 25 percent less likely to have children,"
:::
::: " geneticist at Pennsylvania State University, noting that "if
::: twinning is genetic, then there should be a slight selection bias
::: against it, so that twinning would be kept rare. But some animals
::: twin routinely."
:::
::: So much for natural selection causing divergence or even evolution
::: routinely.0
::
:: 1: Though humans are "animals" - all animals are NOT huimans.
:: You are talking about human twins in one paragraph, and SOME ANIMALS
:: in the other.
::
:: Obviously your conclusion is based more on your ignorance, and
:: warped lies, than reality.

Warped lies is to say that humans having twins is rare. 25% in the U.S.
alone.


What in hell are you talking about? Are you saying that twins make
up 25% of live births or that the US is made up of 25% twins?


The point is proved that NS does not cause divergence with the
Finland Studies alone. "if twinning is genetic, then there should be a
slight selection bias against it, so that twinning would be kept rare."

Do you call 25% rare?

Now what.

.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_percentage_of_twins_in_US_popul...

Answer: 25%
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

--
It is all about the truth with:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
·.¸Adman¸.·
^^^^^^^^^^^

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Finnish Genes Part 2 [it just keeps getting better]
    ... Do you have some secret definition of extinction ... so that twinning would be kept rare. ... The point remains, "if twinning is genetic, then there should be a slight selection bias against it, so that twinning would be kept rare." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Finnish Genes Part 2 [it just keeps getting better]
    ... so that twinning would be kept rare. ... Warped lies is to say that humans having twins is rare. ... slight selection bias against it, so that twinning would be kept rare." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Finnish Genes Part 2 [it just keeps getting better]
    ... so that twinning would be kept rare. ... ::: So much for natural selection causing divergence or even evolution ... Warped lies is to say that humans having twins is rare. ... slight selection bias against it, so that twinning would be kept rare." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Finnish Genes Part 2 [it just keeps getting worse for Mudbrain]
    ... then there should be a slight selection bias ... so that twinning would be kept rare. ... "Studies in Finland show evidence that: 754 twins born between 1734 ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Finnish Genes Part 2 [it just keeps getting better]
    ... so that twinning would be kept rare. ... ::: So much for natural selection causing divergence or even evolution ... Warped lies is to say that humans having twins is rare. ... slight selection bias against it, so that twinning would be kept rare." ...
    (talk.origins)