Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:23:56 GMT
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:11:03 -0500, Damaeus
<no-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
Reading from news:talk.origins,
Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> posted:
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0500, Damaeus
<no-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
but becomes its catalyst for change in humans. It's what keeps
improving humans over time and explains the source of all these
"myths" that people have built over time, which apes and monkeys play
no part in as far as being responsible for their being formed. The
mysteries were formed for humans to solve by a creator who wanted
humans to think.
There is no evidence for a creator, nor for the need for one.
What would you require as evidence for a creator? And that there seems to
be no need for a creator just reveals his ability to hide within
evolutionary processes.
There are lots of things that could be evidence for a creator, but
none have ever been found.
So far we have also found no evidence that a creator is necessary -
everything has a natural explanation.
--
Bob.
.
- References:
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Damaeus
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Mark Isaak
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Damaeus
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Ymir
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Damaeus
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: unrestrained_hand
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Damaeus
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- From: Damaeus
- Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- Prev by Date: Re: More evidence of Noah's Flood, this time from Mongolia
- Next by Date: Re: Mass Stupidity
- Previous by thread: Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- Next by thread: Re: Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading