Re: The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- From: Devils Advocaat <mankygoat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
On 8 Apr, 02:41, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
heekster wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:39:35 -0500, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since my evolutionist friends believe the shared percentage of DNA
is a reliable benchmark for ape to human evolution, let's look at
something else that can be stretched to the same degree.
Human DNA is about 75% similar to that of a nematode, which is
basically a small soil-dwelling worm. Will my evolutionist friends
also suggest that a nematode is 75% human?
If not, then the percent of DNA has no connection from one species to
another
If so, then it looks like the creator used common design patterns
within DNA structure
I don't care how many times you try it; argument from imbecility will
always be a fallacy.
Stop crying like a lil bitch
And perhaps you can clarify your original statement.
Does it mean 75% of the entire human genome matches the nematode
genome?
Or vice versa?
Does it mean 75% of the genes with known function in the human genome
match those in the nematode genome?
Or vice versa?
Does it mean that 75% of the proteins encoded by the human genome
match those encoded by the nematode genome?
Or vice versa?
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- References:
- The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- From: [M]adman
- Re: The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- From: heekster
- Re: The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- From: [M]adman
- The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: On the issue of sanitation
- Next by Date: Re: Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- Next by thread: Re: The elastic plastic theory of evolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|