Re: The Five Kingdom Classification

John Harshman wrote:
[M]adman wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
[M]adman wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
[M]adman wrote:
Inez wrote:
On Mar 29, 1:59 am, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.
Evolution has a foundation problem. What many of you do not
want to admit to is that the man made "Five Kingdom
Classification" of Life is wrong. And that is why evolution is
defined wrong. Each created "kind" should be grouped by
"type". The types depend on their orientation to nature.

The true SIX BIBLICAL "Classifications of Life" are:

1) Plants
Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and
the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in
itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

2) Water creatures
"Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that
hath life,"

3) Creatures of the Sky
"and every winged fowl after his kind"

4) Non-Human Animals
"Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind,
(cattle, pigs reptiles etc)"

5) Bacteria, virus, single cell etc...
"and creeping thing, "
You think viruses creep?

6) Human
"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our
likeness" If evolutionary science wants to achieve any sort of
truth,
then this should be it's starting point. There has been no
magical "split" from one species into two or more. There has
Only been a simple variation within the created "kind" for a
protracted period of time.

Starting with a created "kind" and moving forward in a straight
line, we notice and observe something that COULD be called
micro-evolution taking place; and this is the reason why we see
variety with in the 'kinds'. This is also why new 'kinds' can
be seen emerging which replace the ones that have died out.

So your theory is that a lobster can microevolve into a whale
because they are both water creatures? And that is "simple
variation?"
The catagory is WATER the KIND is lobster.

A lobster will produce another variation of lobster.

Get back with me when you find a lobster that can give rise to a
whale, ok
To make this a bit easier, could you explain how to delimit
kinds? I can't tell whether trilobites, for example, are one kind
or thousands. Are whales all one kind? Do dolphins belong to that
kind? Do hippos? Do cows?
If it can mate and produce an offspring that in turn can mate and
produce an offspring then it is of the same kind.
How do you know that?

It is observed.

No, I mean how do you know that ability to produce offspring delimits
the kinds?

Well... has anyone at any time witnessed a cat and a dog mate successfully
and then produce a fertile and viable offspring that can in turn can mate
and produce an offspring with another of it's own kind?



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
    ... Classification" of Life is wrong. ... Creatures of the Sky ... The catagory is WATER the KIND is lobster. ... produce an offspring then it is of the same kind. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
    ... And that is why evolution is defined wrong. ... Creatures of the Sky ... they are both water creatures? ... The catagory is WATER the KIND is lobster. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
    ... And that is why evolution is defined wrong. ... Creatures of the Sky ... because they are both water creatures? ... The catagory is WATER the KIND is lobster. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
    ... And that is why evolution is defined wrong. ... Creatures of the Sky ... because they are both water creatures? ... The catagory is WATER the KIND is lobster. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
    ... Classification" of Life is wrong. ... Creatures of the Sky ... The catagory is WATER the KIND is lobster. ... produce an offspring then it is of the same kind. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading