Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !



On Mar 28, 3:44 am, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Boikat wrote:
On Mar 27, 9:22 pm, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think it was Kermit that claimed that man has a bigger brain
because evolutionary science says we ate meat at some point in our
evolution.

Well, guess what?

You've discovered that trilobites are *not* Cambrian mammals and now
want to let us poor, ignorant "evolutionists" in on the secret??

<snip>

Boikat

I cannot believe how many of you are so excited that i am wrong for once

Maybe it has something to do with a claim you made in another thread
about how you were *never* wrong?

I'm sure your arrogance plays into it too.

After all, you've never admitted to being wrong about the following:

* "dr" kent hovind was a *brilliant* scientist that made many great
scientific discoveries.

You can't even name one.

* That you have "created genes" and not "evolved ape genes".

Evidence, like a lab report? Of course not.

* You claimed that wars have been fought because science discredited
some aspect of some religious belief.

Yet, you cannot name one war that was fought for that reason.

Wrong for once? Thats another one to ad to the list:

Claims to have been wrong only *once*, ever.

Get over yourself, you're not that smart, and you damned sure have
been wrong many times. Just count up all of your posts.

Boikat

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Commentary: Chimp Change
    ... apparently evolutionary science is evil because it does not use God to ... >> philosophical naturalism). ... > that "evolution is a fact," and then they gradually learn more and more ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Highest IQ.
    ... Ergo, evolution not be true, mutations incapacitate people! ... correct me if I'm wrong: "Evolutionary science is wrong, ... large genepool is smarter than others on the average. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Cosmological Argument
    ... "What is Intelligent Design" which is ... are problematic to a theory of evolution. ... It's just the way evolutionary science defines itself. ... How are you saying that DNA is irreducibly complex? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Cosmological Argument
    ... "What is Intelligent Design" which is ... are problematic to a theory of evolution. ... It's just the way evolutionary science defines itself. ... How are you saying that DNA is irreducibly complex? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Highest IQ.
    ... Ergo, evolution not be true, mutations incapacitate people! ... correct me if I'm wrong: "Evolutionary science is wrong, ... large genepool is smarter than others on the average. ...
    (talk.origins)