Re: The correct definition.



[M]adman wrote:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"[M]adman" <grat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:0qzvl.16569$i9.14497@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

What should be the correct definition for evolution?

"The processes that allows life to continue despite the conditions on
the earth. These conditions allow adaptations to take place in a
linear fashion thereby allowing the original kind to survive and
have many sub-kinds that are each one after their original kind"

There is no strong evidence supporting the idea that there was more
than one "original kind."

There was more then one kind. Science is on the wrong track IMHO. Science
has over looked something or there is something yet to be discovered that
will bring what we already know in better focus.

Science is constantly discovering new things -- by doing science, not
by reading old myths.

In fact i see two (possibly three with the Cambrian) separate and distinct
creations. The first creation much larger and much older with many created
kinds that gave rise to others after their own kind. These created kinds
adapted as the earth changed over the eons. Some survived the meteorite
impacts, the ice ages, and the upheavals the earth has suffered to continue
the life cycle.

Then, a second (or possibly third) creation in the garden of Eden as
described in the Hebrew bible (and other texts) which happened much latter.
This second creation marks the last eon or earth age that we are currently
in. We seem to be living during the last part of the final eon according to
some traditions. For instance, the Myan's traditions to name but one.

When you discover evidence for any of these things, get back to us.


Most do not want to admit these records the ancients left behind have some
truth to them. So by you clinging on to this relativly 'new' idea of
evolution you only hinder science in it's discovery of exactly what has
happened in the past.

The "new" idea of evolution? The idea of evolution has been around
longer than the Christian Bible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution#History_of_evolutionary_thought

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: THATS why.
    ... People throughout history have had experiances that they could not ... If you say science, well, with out a time ... Job 38 ~ Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? ... Creation was an supernatural event that cannot be explained ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: THATS why.
    ... If you say science, well, with out a time ... Job 38 ~ Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? ... Creation was an supernatural event that cannot be explained ... Within the species. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: THATS why.
    ... life appeared on earth. ... If you say science, well, with out a time ... earth, have dominion over animals and multiply. ... Creation was an supernatural event that cannot be explained ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: NY Times reviews AiGs "museum"
    ... sentence as "a $27-million tourist attraction promoting earth science ... the Genesis creation account is not another Near East ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: NY Times reviews AiGs "museum"
    ... sentence as "a $27-million tourist attraction promoting earth science ... the Genesis creation account is not another Near East ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading