Re: May i have your attention please.

On Mar 11, 8:23 pm, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From the T.O. web site

Talk.origins ("t.o.") is a newsgroup devoted to the discussion of issues
related to biological and physical origins. Topics discussed include, but
are not limited to, evolution, creation, abiogenesis, catastrophism,
cosmology, and theology.

Other types of posts, however, are welcome (and, in fact, refreshing!),
particularly [MI]:
A scientific Theory of Creation
Personal experiences which have affected your attitudes on the subject
Relevant news, scientific and/or political
Anything original, entertaining, and/or downright brilliant :-)

Key words to remember kiddies:

"but are not limited to"  and "Other types of posts, however, are welcome"

I hope this clears up Off Topic Posting for those that wish to persue their
own brand of censorship as i have read recently.

***************************
Also please note that the Talk Origin GODS do NOT think science has absolute
truth:

<quote>
"Moreover, "fact" doesn't mean "absolute certainty"
</quote>

So the next time you whine that your facts from a web site are gold remember
that the TO Gods say that your facts are NOT "absolute certainty". Which
means YOU could be WRONG.

how about THAT.

;-)


Yes. And when new evidence is presented that demonstrates the existing
theories are wrong, scientists work on new theories.

The key concept here is "evidence." You have none.

The theory of evolution is by far the best scientific theory we have
at the current time for explaining the evidence we see of the
diversity of life on earth. No other theory comes close.

When you actually have evidence that invalidates the theory of
evolution (sorry, but this will require actually understanding the
theory first, which you have demonstrated you do not), or when you
have a new scientific theory that explains the evidence better (sorry,
but this will require that you know what science is, which you have
demonstrated that you do not), then you will have something worth
saying.

Until then, you're just babbling.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your ... Ignorance of the law is no excuse. ... > Do we not have the right to present evidence to the contrary. ... > This NG is called talk.origins, with origins being the operative word. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your ... Disagree all you like, but if you disagree with science for religious ... have a hypothesis that explains the evidence better than existing ... > This NG is called talk.origins, with origins being the operative word. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: May i have your attention please.
    ... issues related to biological and physical origins. ... And when new evidence is presented that demonstrates the existing ... The theory of evolution is by far the best scientific theory we have ... Until you find that 'absolute truth', I would say you are just babbling ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Orlando School Debates Including "Intelligent Design" in Class
    ... explains the origins of life on earth as derived from an "intelligent ... cause" rather than through natural selection and evolution. ... and parent Veronica Bryant said a lack of fossil evidence supports ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >>> You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your ... >> Do we not have the right to present evidence to the contrary. ... >> This NG is called talk.origins, with origins being the operative word. ... the truth _is_ rather hard to debunk. ...
    (talk.origins)