Re: ==Only They==

On 11 Mar, 16:26, Mark Evans <mev...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 10, 11:57 pm, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





Dave Oldridge wrote:
"[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:L6ltl.13869$b9.8553@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

unrestrained_h...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 9, 6:07 am, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:HcRsl.13088$v8.12190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

The average TO'er feels that they,

=AND only THEY=,

are in possession of the absolute and real truth.

Their posts are clear evidence of this.

For that reason, i suggest we can now close down all of the
science labs and burn all of the books

They will no longer needed. Mkay?

All one has to do is come to TO for the absolute truth. It
matters not the question. Because the absolute truth is right
here.

Everyone is to consider the words of TO as if they were coming
from the burning bush. Because there is no information, or POV,
or scientific discovery worthy to be considered if it did NOT
originate @ T.O.

In fact, and as of now, the burning bush originated at TO as
well.

I hope this information helps those looking for real and absolute
truth.

</sarcasm>

But what would a devout liar like you know of any kind of truth?

YOU were not paying attention.

THE ONLY TRUTH IN THE WORLD THAT IS REAL COMES FROM T.O.

No, TO denizens refer to and occasionally explain science, which is
real (since it derives from reality), but is never claimed to be
absolute.

Well, ya see there. You are claiming YOUR truth is the only real
truth. Which is absolute. Hence you call it reality.

Here YOU are demonstrating that you are unable to read plain English
with comprehension.  Why should anyone believe that you understand
science better than scientists and religion better than theologians?

But your own science says there are other dimensions.  So you do not
know for sure which reality is more real do you?

Uh, IF there are other dimensions, they are very much a part of
reality (reality is not multipe except in your head).

There just might be another dimention with a reality and truth closer
to reality then this one.

You have been watching too much sci-fi TV.  That stuff is FICTION.

None of us have ever claimed that we have all the truth, nor that
the truth is absolute. Whatever reality there is outside our minds;
we have the possibility that any model of it is wrong. The
probability is high that *some of it is wrong. You have been told
this before, many times.

Even you are welcome to show us where mainstream science is wrong on
a particular point. All you have to do is show us the evidence.
Please take under advisement the observation that you have not yet
shown that you understand on the most basic level what the Theory of
Evolution actually is.  You have never described it accurately. It
would also serve you well to know that reality is what it is, and
not what you - or I - want it to be. The call for evidence is not a
rhetorical trick.

You have offered no evidence so far but your own assertions. Pardon
me while I yawn.

Kermit

I have offered evidence. You have refused to accept it. Why? ...
because YOU think you are the holder of truth

You haven't really.  You just keep dredging up deliberate, cunning
lies, clearly DESIGNED to deeive the ignorant.  The fact that they are
convincing YOU shows only that you lack the ability or the will to
learn the science.

The fact that they are clearly deliberate attempts to deceive
demonstrates mens rea.  Thus we must conclude that you are either a
gullible sucker or that you are part of a conspiracy to deceive.
Possibly both

Let's see.
I am deliberate as well as cunning. Part of a conspiracy to deceive. All of
which suggest intelligence.

\\\\\       //////
 =====BUT======
/////       \\\\\\

I am also gullible.

You guys crack me up!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Intelligence and cunning do not preclude being gullible.  But you show
few signs of the first two and an abundance of the third.

Reminds me of an episode of QI hosted by Stephen Fry, when one of the
contestants informed him with such a straight face that the word
gullible had been removed from all the English dictionaries, and he
fell for it hook, line and sinker.

Mr Fry isn't exactly stupid, but he sure was shown to be gullible on
that show.

Mark Evans- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.

Relevant Pages

  • Religious Truth
    ... deny that there is such a thing as Truth and science is not about truth but ... it science or anyone else is seeking or talking about? ... In Islam Allah is Reality and His word or Command is Truth. ... give us experiences. ...
    (soc.religion.islam)
  • Re: ==Only They==
    ... Because the absolute truth is right ... No, TO denizens refer to and occasionally explain science, which is ... Hence you call it reality. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: ==Only They==
    ... Because the absolute truth is right ... Hence you call it reality. ... science better than scientists and religion better than theologians? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: ==Only They==
    ... Because the absolute truth is right ... No, TO denizens refer to and occasionally explain science, which is ... Hence you call it reality. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: ==Only They==
    ... science labs and burn all of the books ... Because the absolute truth is right ... Hence you call it reality. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading