Re: UK: Creationism 'should be taught in science lessons'
- From: Burkhard <b.schafer@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
On 11 Mar, 00:02, "websearch" <websea...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Burkhard" <b.scha...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:d6730a2b-bf49-4862-
I advised a local school on
forensic archeology, and even if I say it myself, the lessons that
came out of it were great, and the kids loved it)
What could possibly be 'forensic'about *archaeology*? Who could ever be
prosecuted??
W.
When you find a burial site, you don't necessarily know how old it is,
and whether it is for the police or the historians. So police will
sometimes need the help of a trained archaeologist to analyse the
finds. particularly in investigations of genocide for the
international criminal court, when old mass graves had to be
examined, but also in civil litigation: If you have a boundary
dispute, archaeologists can find olf fence lines etc to determine
where boundaries used to be in the past.
What we did in the class was to look at murders that are indeed too
old to be prosecuted - We looked at Oetzi. But the methods remain the
same.
this link gives you some ideas:
http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/dcmt/departments/dassr/pdfs/v2_4th%20forensic%20%20archaeology_lr.pdf
.
- References:
- UK: Creationism 'should be taught in science lessons'
- From: Jason Spaceman
- Re: UK: Creationism 'should be taught in science lessons'
- From: Burkhard
- Re: UK: Creationism 'should be taught in science lessons'
- From: websearch
- UK: Creationism 'should be taught in science lessons'
- Prev by Date: Re: Babu G. Ranganathan, idiot extraordinaire
- Next by Date: Creation Vacations (leave your mind behind)
- Previous by thread: Re: UK: Creationism 'should be taught in science lessons'
- Next by thread: Monkey Business: The Louisiana Science Education Act
- Index(es):