Re: What is Evolution?



[M]adman wrote:
Augray wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 04:33:07 -0600, "[M]adman" <grat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in <wR6sl.12257$9a.1127@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :

richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 6, 4:24 am, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
utre...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Isn't evoulution just a hypothesis given by Charles Darwin that is
backed up by some theories and is believed by some scientists used
to explain the origin of mankind?

Yes

Isn't that what true Christianity is also?

Yes

Has it ever occurred to you that if you were to educate yourself in
science in general and evolutionary biology in particular you would
not make yourself look dogmatically ignorant and stupid all the
time?

Still, and as I keep explaining, I post here to expose the ignorance
and stupidity of creationists. In your case, you can produce
ignorance and stupidity without prompting.

RF

Well Richard. The shoe could be placed on the other foot.

Has it ever occurred to you that if you were to educate yourself in
ancient history, ancient languages and biblical history in
particular you would
not make yourself look so ignorant and /bias/ toward a single
perspective all the time?

A person who thinks that Syrian documents are our source for Roman
history is hardly in a position to be critical about this.

Lying ?



You rave like a dog foaming at the mouth constantly how you post to
expose ignorant and stupid creationist but you do not notice your
own ignorance and stupidity on the subject.

Someone who claims that the Letter of Jude is the last book in the
Bible shouldn't be lecturing others on stupidity.

It is the last book. St. Jude's epistle is the last epistle.

Revelation is not an epistle like all the others.

It is a revelation.

You would understand this if you were biblically literate.




Do you actually think you have a patent on what is the truth? You
possess a single perspective on the issue. And your perspective is
based on a bias interpretation of the evidences. I hardly call that
a search for real truth.

Anyone who says that "The. Bible. Takes. Precedence. Every. Time." is
not on search for real truth, they think that they've already found
it.

Out of contect...

Compared to science it should take precedence.

Science should be using the bible as a guide and to assist it in finding
real truth.


How well did that work in the case of Galileo?

Do yourself a favor -- put the Bible down and read a few history
books.

<...>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What is Evolution?
    ... not make yourself look dogmatically ignorant and stupid all the ... ignorance and stupidity without prompting. ... not on search for real truth, they think that they've already found ... perspectives. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What is Evolution?
    ... and stupidity without prompting. ... not make yourself look so ignorant and /bias/ toward a single perspective ... I hardly call that a search for real truth. ... Real truth comes from examining the evidence. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What is Evolution?
    ... and stupidity without prompting. ... ancient history, ancient languages and biblical history in particular you ... not make yourself look so ignorant and /bias/ toward a single perspective ... I hardly call that a search for real truth. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What is Evolution?
    ... and stupidity without prompting. ... ancient history, ancient languages and biblical history in particular you ... not make yourself look so ignorant and /bias/ toward a single perspective ... I hardly call that a search for real truth. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: I wont argue with this
    ... to willfully remaining ignorant and choosing to be a Marxist wannabe... ... And the guy in the oval office is going to be out of options. ... Chamberlin and Hitler are just footnotes in history as you happily slide ... All they have to do is nuke a military ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
Loading