talk.origins

• Thread Index

---

• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: did great salt lakes cause permian extinction
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: did great salt lakes cause permian extinction
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Stuart
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Stuart
• Re: It's bullshit....
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: did great salt lakes cause permian extinction
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: eroot
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• did great salt lakes cause permian extinction
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Chris
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: This just in
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: AC
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: AC
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: video of HIV infected cell infecting another cell
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Dr. Acula
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Bill
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Iain
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: video of HIV infected cell infecting another cell
  • From: Bill
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Bill
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: Iain
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: walkmar
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Kent
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: Iain
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: This just in
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: This just in
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: garyhard
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Leading Paleoanthropologist identified Carboniferous Human
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: It's bullshit....
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: This just in
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Retraction
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: It's bullshit....
  • From: websearch
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: It's bullshit....
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: video of HIV infected cell infecting another cell
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: This just in
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Ground Breaking Discovery Denied by Smithsonian
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: TomS
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: This just in
  • From: Chris
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Occidental
• Re: This just in
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: All About THE GOLDEN RULE
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Ground Breaking Discovery Denied by Smithsonian
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Chris
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: David H.
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Occidental
• Re: This just in
  • From: Boikat
• Re: This just in
  • From: Boikat
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: jc
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: This just in
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: This just in
  • From: Inez
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Inez
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: This just in
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: Fiery
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: This just in
  • From: Chris
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• chez what! Re: This just in
  • From: Chris
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: wf3h
• Re: This just in
  • From: TomS
• Re: More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: wf3h
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Leading Paleoanthropologist identified Carboniferous Human
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: JPG
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Leading Paleoanthropologist identified Carboniferous Human Skullcap
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: All About THE GOLDEN RULE
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: This just in
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• More Evidence Dino's lived with man
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Davej
• Re: This just in
  • From: Frank J
• video of HIV infected cell infecting another cell
  • From: wf3h
• Re: This just in
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: This just in
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Re: The geological column
  • From: TomS
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: All About THE GOLDEN RULE
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: This just in
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: This just in
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: This just in
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: This just in
  • From: Inez
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: This just in
  • From: wf3h
• Re: This just in
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: It's bullshit....
  • From: eroot
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: AlwaysAskingQuestions
• Re: This just in
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: No stamina
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: AlwaysAskingQuestions
• It's bullshit....
  • From: websearch
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: eriley
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• GIRLS CLIPS EASY MONEY ONLINE GAMES
  • From: Pussy Girls
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: This just in
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: All About THE GOLDEN RULE
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: Iain
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: Iain
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Iain
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: walkmar
• All About THE GOLDEN RULE
  • From: (David P.)
• When the Rule became the "Golden" Rule
  • From: (David P.)
• Obama's Faith in the Golden Rule
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: walkmar
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Was: treachery)
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: walkmar
• Re: T.o's first book?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: John Smith
• T.o's first book?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: This just in
  • From: Furry Trilobite
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: This just in
  • From: Boikat
• Re: This just in
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• This just in
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Lenny = No Brains.
  • From: Bill
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Notre Dame and Obama
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Chris
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Chris
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: websearch
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolution Refutes Racism
  • From: websearch
• Re: Darwin Movie
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: UFOs
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• News: Dean aims to plug public into science
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Augray
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolution Refutes Racism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: No stamina
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: boring
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: boring
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: boring
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution Refutes Racism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Oklahoma: Dispute evolves on OU speech by scientist
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: heekster
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: heekster
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Spincronic = No Brains.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: No stamina
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Is This A Contradiction I See Before Me?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: heekster
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Spincronic = No Brains.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: heekster
• Re: boring
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: Vend
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: boring
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Darwin Movie
  • From: Iain
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* Not "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* NOT "Racist".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Chris
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Retraction
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Iain
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Bill
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Spincronic = No Brains.
  • From: Bill
• Re: No stamina
  • From: Bill
• Compass - The Atheists.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: Iain
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Kaduli van Iljeis
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: TomS
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution Refutes Racism
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Spincronic = No Brains.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: TomS
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: No stamina
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution Refutes Racism
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: John Bode
• Re: The geological column
  • From: TomS
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Fredwah
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Inez
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The geological column
  • From: TomS
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: UFOs
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Occidental
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Evolution Refutes Racism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Was: treachery)
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• One more conference of IEEE that has accepted bogus papers
  • From: bowlleravner@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Yes Adman. "Evolution" *is* "Racist".
  • From: spintronic
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Chris
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Erwin Moller
• No stamina
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Speaking of Ed Conrad.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ymir
• Re: boring
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Dewey Henize
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Chris
• Re: boring
  • From: TomS
• Re: The geological column
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: John Smith
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: TomS
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Was: treachery)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Wikipedia and Trimurti
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Chris
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: Allen
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: wf3h
• hi
  • From: About Assam
• hi
  • From: About Assam
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Chris
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Chris M
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The geological column
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ilas
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Predator X
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Predator X
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Was: treachery)
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: eriley
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Wikipedia and Trimurti
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: potm Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Predator X
  • From: George Cleveland
• Wikipedia and Trimurti
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Predator X
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Predator X
  • From: Boikat
• Look-alike Q
  • From: Chris M
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Look-alike Q
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: potm Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Stephen
• CHEZ WATT NOM
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: interesting article on the delusions of creationism
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: Chris
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Madman: I call loki
  • From: raven1
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: raven1
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: interesting article on the delusions of creationism
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: boring
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: boring
  • From: Boikat
• Re: compelling evidence
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Madman never gets anything right.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Madman: I call loki
  • From: Iain
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Iain
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Free Lunch
• Universe-1-StarStuff.avi - 29:04 - Oct 2, 2007
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: New proof falsifies Ray and [M]adman again.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Mike Duffy
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Madman never gets anything right.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: interesting article on the delusions of creationism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The geological column
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: The geological column
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: heekster
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Chris
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike L
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Occidental
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: compelling evidence
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The geological column
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: X-No-Archive (Re: My daughter.)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: raven1
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: raven1
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: raven1
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Stuart
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: raven1
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Simple mathematical model of Natural Selection in sexual populations.
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Speaking of Ed Conrad.
  • From: John Smith
• Re: boring
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Pierre
• Re: boring
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Iain
• Re: The geological column
  • From: TomS
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: alextangent
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: John Smith
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: interesting article on the delusions of creationism
  • From: John Smith
• Corrections/suggestions requested on POTM presentations
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Madman never gets anything right.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: gregwrld
• interesting article on the delusions of creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: MaxDWolf
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: No Carboniferous mammals
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The geological column
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: R Brown
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: adman and the truth are total strangers.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: boring
  • From: Boikat
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: wf3h
• Re: boring
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: boring
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: boring
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The geological column
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Carboniferous Man never existed.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The geological column
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Bill
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Adam and Eve were the first humans - GOD made them!!!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: MaxDWolf
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: MaxDWolf
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: MaxDWolf
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: stacked high re: UFOs
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: The geological column
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: walter_evening
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: compelling evidence
  • From: walter_evening
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: kiss2b2
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: walter_evening
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: walter_evening
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: boring
  • From: raven1
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Adam and Eve were the first humans - GOD made them!!!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: TomS
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Frank J
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: eroot
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Chris
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Evolutionary Humour
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: TomS
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: Bill
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: TomS
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: prigator
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The geological column
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Inez
• Re: The geological column
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The geological column
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Iain
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Iain
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Iain
• Re: texans abandon sheep dip of creationism
  • From: Iain
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: No Carboniferous mammals
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Retraction
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Retraction
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: eerok
• The geological column
  • From: [M]adman
• The Five Kingdom Classification
  • From: [M]adman
• No Carboniferous mammals
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• stacked high re: UFOs
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Madman's dying belief system
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth - or in his case, the lack of truth.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: dabuckna
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: dabuckna
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: eriley
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: GoldLions
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Carboniferous Man evolved into knucle walking
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Glenn
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: raven1
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: raven1
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: marks542004
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: boring
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: boring
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Retraction
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: William Morse
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Chris
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: boring
  • From: Boikat
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: William Morse
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: boring
  • From: Boikat
• Re: boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: boring
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• boring
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Stephen
• Re: potm Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: ?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: world gets plunged in 150-day baptism 2370 BC and 2009 AD
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: 13
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: I know.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 13
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Frank J
• Re: re-spew re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Frank J
• Re: 13
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Iain
• Re: ?
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Boikat
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Nashton
• Re: major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Mike L
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Jeff Rosenberg
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: John you crazy coot.,
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Gastrich?
  • From: usenetposts
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Gastrich?
  • From: usenetposts
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Ray Martinez
• New proof Ed has rocks in his head.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I know.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: Frank J
• not on speaking terms re: adman and the truth
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Kinda like this
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• John you crazy coot.,
  • From: spintronic
• Re: major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: Stephen
• Kinda like this
  • From: John Smith
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Augray
• Re: Stupid creationist tricks
  • From: John Smith
• Re: I know.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: I know.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Greg G.
• major discovery institute funder switches to democratic party
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: I know.
  • From: Bill
• Re: I know.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: heekster
• Re: I know.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: heekster
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Steven L.
• New proof falsifies evolutionists again.
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: heekster
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: raven1
• Re: 13
  • From: Bill
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: heekster
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Stupid creationist tricks
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: heekster
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Desertphile
• Texas on evolution: Needs further study
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: potm Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: ?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Stupid creationist tricks
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• potm Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Occidental
• chez what was Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: Retraction
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Frank J
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Augray
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Augray
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Chris
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: wf3h
• Canada's Modern Day Lynching Of A Black Man By Peel Regional
  • From: leaniosl
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Was: treachery)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Stuart
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Madman and his "everything is wrong" idea
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Retraction
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Stupid creationist tricks
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Retraction
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: TomS
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Julian Jaynes (Was: treachery)
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Stupid creationist tricks
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Iain
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Iain
• Re: Retraction
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Retraction
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Chez watt (Re: Is Evolution Racist?)
  • From: nmp
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Retraction
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Cannabis and Coke - THC boosts mRNA synthesis ... and so does sugar and phosphoric acid
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: 13
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: 13
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: truth
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: truth
  • From: Chris
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Augray
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Walter Bushell
• riddle
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Is Evolution Racist?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: John Harshman
• Another back-peddle? sheesh !
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: ?
  • From: Inez
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Stuart
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Stuart
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: texans abandon sheep dip of creationism
  • From: Stephen
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Stuart
• Re: 13
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Stuart
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: ?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Trilobites
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Trilobites
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 13
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: I know.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Re: 13
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I know.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: 13
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: I know.
  • From: Bill
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Augray
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike L
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: ?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Mike L
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: ?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: AC
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: AC
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: AC
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Therion Ware
• 13
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: Bill
• I know.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: ?
  • From: Bill
• Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: spintronic
• Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: spintronic
• Re: ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Arthur Stanley Eddington
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: ?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• ?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Percentage of "the rational"?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: UFOs
  • From: sasam2
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Chez Watt: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: UFOs
  • From: dali_70
• Re: Percentage of "the rational"?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: Moist Lipwig
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: TomS
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Silly
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Silly
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Inez
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Inez
• Re: Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Fact -- a useless concept
  • From: Kent
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: hersheyh
• Percentage of "the rational"?
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: UFOs
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: UFOs
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Boikat
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: JohnN
• Re: Reporter Wrong on "Atlantis" claim
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Boikat
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: tartanflyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: D9000
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Boikat
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Boikat
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Boikat
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: Boikat
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Boikat
• Re: More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: dali_70
• texans abandon sheep dip of creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Silly
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Iain
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: UFOs
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: wf3h
• Re: UFOs
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: LTflermy
• More on the Texas fiasco
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Iain
• Re: Silly
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: UFOs
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: TomS
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Frank J
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: TomS
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: wf3h
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: UFOs
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: TomS
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: TomS
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: eroot
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: eroot
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Silly
  • From: Damaeus
• POTM: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Burkhard
• Chez Watt: How About THAT
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Stuart
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: UFOs
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Silly
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: The Pooflinger
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: raven1
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• OT. Are USA states with more atheists safer?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Ray v. Howard
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Ray v. Howard
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: William Morse
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Silly
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Silly
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: William Morse
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: UFOs
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: UFOs
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• OT: How he learned to loathe the bomb. Twice.
  • From: macaddicted
• UFOs
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: A dying belief system
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Frank J
• A dying belief system
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Silly
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Silly
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: POTM Nomination Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Vend
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Silly
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: heekster
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Commentary: Darwin's two-for-one deal
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Dwib
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Silly
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Chez Watt : How About THAT
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Iain
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• I apologise, for the overprotection.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Bill
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: My daughter.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Chris
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• My daughter.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How About Same Old Nonsense
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: TomS
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: mrbgoogle
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How About Same Old Nonsense
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Silly
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: adman and the truth
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Silly
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About Same Old Nonsense
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: [M]adman and the truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Silly
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Silly
  • From: tartanflyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Bill
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: wf3h
• [M]adman and the truth
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Silly
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: News: Research links evolution of fins and limbs with that of
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About Same Old Nonsense
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Pray before ditching?
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Reporter Wrong on "Atlantis" claim
  • From: xenocyte
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: daoudmbo
• Re: The New "Atlantis" claim
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• How About Same Old Nonsense
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Reporter Wrong on "Atlantis" claim
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: jc
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Augray
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: TomS
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Augray
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Augray
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Silly
  • From: Boikat
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: Boikat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How About THAT
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Silly
  • From: JPG
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: 381510380723129
  • From: JPG
• Re: truth
  • From: Chris
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Rolf
• How About THAT
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Silly
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: wf3h
• Texas: National Science Teachers Association
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Silly
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ray gets mouthwash; tucks tail.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: News: Research links evolution of fins and limbs with that of
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Did Ray write the rules of debate?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Silly
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Silly
  • From: Inez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Silly
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Silly
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Silly
  • From: Geode
• Re: Silly
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Silly
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Silly
  • From: eroot
• Pray before ditching?
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Silly
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Did Ray write the rules of debate?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Silly
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Silly
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Silly
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Iain
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Stephen
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Boikat
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Boikat
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Ray gets mouthwash; tucks tail.
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: POTM Nomination Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: truth
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: William Morse
• Chez Watt -- Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: rupert . morrish
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Stuart
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Old Joke
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Texas School Board chair writes and op-ed
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Sox
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: 381510380723129
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Stuart
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Sox
• Re: truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: News: Research links evolution of fins and limbs with that of
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Did Ray write the rules of debate?
  • From: ibrahimbushati
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: heekster
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Sox
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: heekster
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: 443117908543242407136016560705390410004495361
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: heekster
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pandasthumb.org down ?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: truth
  • From: heekster
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: rich hammett
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Video: CCS - Absolute Truth.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 443117908543242407136016560705390410004495361
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: heekster
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• Re: 443117908543242407136016560705390410004495361
  • From: Bill
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: heekster
• News: Research links evolution of fins and limbs with that of gills.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: John Stockwell
• News: Court rejects evolution on the 'Net case.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Augray
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: truth
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Stuart
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Ray gets mouthwash; tucks tail.
  • From: Desertphile
• 381510380723129
  • From: spintronic
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Augray
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: heekster
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: eroot
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: eroot
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Stuart
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Inez
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Stuart
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• compelling evidence for atlantis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: John Smith
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: So how did it go?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: POTM Nomination Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Dale Leaman
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: David H.
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: Bill
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: wf3h
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Iain
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• animals DO enjoy sex...and orgasms
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: truth
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Inez
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: John Bode
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Chris
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: truth
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• POTM Nomination Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: truth
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Pandasthumb.org down ?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Chris
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: heekster
• Re: truth
  • From: heekster
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: modularity re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Chez Watt, wasRe: truth
  • From: heekster
• Ray gets mouthwash; tucks tail.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Old Joke
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: heekster
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: heekster
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: AC
• Re: WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: modularity re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• WingNutDaily editor weighs in on fossil find
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: modularity re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Vend
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Vend
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Chris
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: TomS
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Avian ratiocination
  • From: Chris
• Re: News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: truth
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: jimfcartwright
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Avian ratiocination
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Vend
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Pandasthumb.org down ?
  • From: Spillerix
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: R Brown
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: R Brown
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: bskiles
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• News: Evidence - Hidden in Plain Sight
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: TomS
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Chris
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Spillerix
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Pandasthumb.org down ?
  • From: Paul Browning
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Chez Watt
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: truth
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Chris
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Rolf
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Rolf
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Who can Win
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ha
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Confused about Evolution?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Who can Win
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Confused about Evolution?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: William Morse
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Boikat
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Ray The Pot calls a kettle "black"
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: heekster
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Richard Dawkins interviews Father George Coyne
  • From: heekster
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Inez
• Re: The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: So how did it go?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: heekster
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: heekster
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: heekster
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Chris
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: So how did it go?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: heekster
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Inez
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: mor
  • From: heekster
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: heekster
• Re: truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: truth
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: heekster
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: heekster
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: So how did it go?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific institutions
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: John Harshman
• So how did it go?
  • From: Iain
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: Bill
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: If I give respect.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: Ritsjoena
• Re: truth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: heekster
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another pointless troll
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• If I give respect.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: AC
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: AC
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Chez Watt Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: truth
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Bill
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: truth
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: truth
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: truth
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: truth
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Moist Lipwig
• How do you form impressions about others?
  • From: impressionssurvey@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: truth
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Bill
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S.
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S. National
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S. National
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why God dislikes Pope and evolution
  • From: Moist Lipwig
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: sven . akerlund
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: Bill
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: andy . gardner
• Re: The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: rich hammett
• Re: Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S. National
  • From: John Smith
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Guido
• Re: views of academic scientists
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Lenny the loon
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• views of academic scientists
  • From: TomS
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Chris
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: truth
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: truth
  • From: Inez
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: truth
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: dali_70
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: truth
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific institutions
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Rnorman
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Augray
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: truth
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Attn: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: truth
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT? American blasphemy laws
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Yuck
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: truth
  • From: R Brown
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Chris
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: R Brown
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Boikat
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: provenance re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: truth
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: note to creationist mendicaters
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: truth
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S.
  • From: dali_70
• Re: truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Inez
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: sexual selection and evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Boikat
• Ed's fossils are your Gospel, not WMD, not threat to U.S. National
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Inez
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• sexual selection and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: truth
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Rnorman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: truth
  • From: Fiery
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: TomS
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: mor
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Chris
• Re: truth
  • From: Inez
• Re: truth
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: truth
  • From: Inez
• Re: truth
  • From: Inez
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ilas
• Bad Science 2: "Anthropomorphism Rules OK."
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: truth
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Am I the only one ? BooHoo.
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Questions Ray May Have Trouble With
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• What will be the origin of payments for the "Old Timers"?
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: truth
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: truth
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Am I the only one ? BooHoo.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: truth
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: truth
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: truth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: murdock
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: truth
  • From: [M]adman
• 99% Ape - How Evolution Doesn't Add Up
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: mor
  • From: Boikat
• Re: truth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Guess that teaches...
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: truth
  • From: Boikat
• Final proof for Carboniferous human bones
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Guess that teaches...
  • From: einstein254
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Don Cates
• truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: William Morse
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: mor
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: note to creationist mendicaters
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Another pointless troll
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Why?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: heekster
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: heekster
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Richard Dawkins interviews Father George Coyne
  • From: heekster
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Yuck
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Richard Dawkins interviews Father George Coyne
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• chez watt => was Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: Yuck
  • From: websearch
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Yuck
  • From: Chris
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: heekster
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: heekster
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: Chris
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: heekster
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Yuck
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: heekster
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yuck
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yuck
  • From: websearch
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Am I the only one ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Chris
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yuck
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ha
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: heekster
• Am I the only one ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Yuck
  • From: websearch
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: heekster
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: heekster
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: heekster
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Ha
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: heekster
• Re: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yuck
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: sonar picks up "Atlantis" claim
  • From: Inez
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Richard Dawkins interviews Father George Coyne
  • From: einstein254
• Re: Why?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: eroot
• Re: Yuck
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• OT: Yuck
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: sonar picks up "Atlantis" claim
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yuck
  • From: eroot
• Yuck
  • From: Joe Cummings
• The respect in which the Wedge scam succeeded
  • From: Iain
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Why?
  • From: einstein254
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Ha
  • From: Bill
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ha
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Ha
  • From: Bill
• Re: Lenny the loon
  • From: Bill
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: Bill
• Lenny the loon
  • From: einstein254
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Quick question.
  • From: einstein254
• Ha
  • From: einstein254
• Quick question.
  • From: einstein254
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Iain
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Chris
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Chris
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: JohnN
• Chez Watt Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Dwib
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Dwib
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Chris
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Chris
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Inez
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Another pointless troll
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: dali_70
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Chris
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: What was that again...
  • From: Boikat
• Felsenstein v. Dembski
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Chris
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Chris
• What was that again...
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Wombat
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Chris
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: Boikat
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: Chris
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Skeptic's Dictionary adds YEC entry
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: einstein254
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Boikat
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: TomS
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Skeptic's Dictionary adds YEC entry
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: wf3h
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• OT: Rights, was: Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Rolf
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: TomS
• Re: EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: reposted
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: TomS
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• More Creationist Frauds
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• EXPOSED! : More Creationist Nonsense
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: wf3h
• OT: Python Trek
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Wombat
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Omega Point
  • From: JPG
• Re: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Vend
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Anthropic principle
  • From: Iain
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Iain
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Vend
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Wombat
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Another fraud
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Another fraud
  • From: [M]adman
• Anthropic principle
  • From: [M]adman
• Omega Point
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Stephen
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: harry k
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: raven1
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: heekster
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: raven1
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: heekster
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: heekster
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Noah's Boat. God's Design.
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Vend
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Right I'm Off!!
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Prof. MacRae, your photo shows HC of Ed's EC96-001
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Right I'm Off!!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Prof. MacRae, your photo shows HC of Ed's EC96-001
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: heekster
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: heekster
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: heekster
• Re: Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: heekster
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: mor
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: spintronic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Jesus said: build on rock, not sand (= Darwin 1859)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Frank J
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Bill
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bill
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Attn: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: jjmollier
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ye Old One
• mor
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Bill
• Re: Lenny stuck around.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Test, please ignore
  • From: jjmollier
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Bill
• I am not censoring Ray!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Frank J
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: Bill
• Re: Definition of "evolution"
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: heekster
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Lenny stuck around.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Martin Kaletsch
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: stan_the_fisher
• Re: the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: prigator
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Frank J
• Re: sock puppet gullibility re: Play dead again in broken shells,
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: PREDATOR X!
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Attn: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Augray
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Vend
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Bill
• Re: the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Test, please ignore
  • From: MoonsOfJupiter
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: heekster
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Attn: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: rumble gut re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• the role of literature from an evolutionary perspective
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• rumble gut re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Bill
• pied re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Test, please ignore
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: heekster
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: heekster
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Chez Watt : Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: heekster
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Test, please ignore
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Attn: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: TomS
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Test, please ignore
  • From: Boikat
• Attn: Upright BiPed of Uncommon Descent
  • From: jjmollier
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: heekster
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Boikat
• Test, please ignore
  • From: jjmollier
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Strange Creature
• Re: Prof. MacRae, your photo shows HC of Ed's EC96-001
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Dan Luke
• Prof. MacRae, your photo shows HC of Ed's EC96-001
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: PREDATOR X!
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Vend
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: TomS
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Vend
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT On Education
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Chez Watt : Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: PREDATOR X!
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: PREDATOR X!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Chez Watt : Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Frank J
• OT On Education
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE
  • From: Donnyhall43
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Chris
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: thank Chaos for the human brain!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• PREDATOR X!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Definition of "evolution"
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: Boikat
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: raven1
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: reposted
  • From: Boikat
• evolution, intellectuals and '2 cultures'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: eroot
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: heekster
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• neuropsychology and decision making
  • From: wf3h
• Chez Watt? (was: Re: Public Service Announcment)
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: Zaius
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Boikat
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Boikat
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: did the essenes exist and did they write the dead sea scrolls
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: ==Only They==
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bill
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Nutrient-Powered Evolution
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: reposted
  • From: heekster
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Stealin' dem bones
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: raven1
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bill
• Re: OT? American blasphemy laws
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: Bill
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: OT: the ARIS 2008 report
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Public Service Announcment
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: spintronic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: heekster
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Public Service Announcment
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: spintronic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: 100% certain eyewitness puts wrong man in prison
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: wf3h
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT: Finally Tonight, Jesus...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: reposted
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: reposted
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• Re: OT: Finally Tonight, Jesus...
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: OT: Finally Tonight, Jesus...
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• OT: Finally Tonight, Jesus...
  • From: Occidental
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bill
• Re: Evolution is here to stay
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Chris
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• amen
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Evolution is here to stay
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bill
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Pete
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: OT? American blasphemy laws
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: sang freud re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Bill
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Why is 2.00000001 a prime number and 3.6 is not. (and why id Ye Old
  • From: Bill
• sang freud re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: OT? American blasphemy laws
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Why Spincronic is an idiot troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: reposted
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Dick C.
• OT? American blasphemy laws
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: indriko
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: snowball earth and life
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Evolution is here to stay
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: hi>> hi...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Inez
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Darwin must go; evolutionists must go
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: eroot
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: eroot
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Stephen
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Frank J
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: TomS
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Bill
• The Ye Old One Song.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: snowball earth and life
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Augray
• NCSE on youtube.com
  • From: TomS
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins'
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: John Smith
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: TomS
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Frank J
• Re: GOD made humans, animals, plants - he even made the dinosaurs!
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Frank J
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Roger Jolly
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Very Simple Questions For Ray Martinez
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: In the News: Liberty University and its bio department
  • From: Ritsjoena
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: reposted
  • From: Wombat
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: In the News: Liberty University and its bio department
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: dirty drinking water
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Smith
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: John Smith
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: John Smith
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: John Smith
• Re: snowball earth and life
  • From: John Smith
• Re: In the News: Liberty University and its bio department
  • From: John Smith
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• myliit re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• OT: vatican official defends abortion for raped child
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Dick C.
• dirty drinking water
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: In the News: Liberty University and its bio department
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Dick C.
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Away from Talk.Origins atheists are less disgusting
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: harry k
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: heekster
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Definition of "evolution"
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: murdock
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Don't persecute religious fanatics. Point and laugh.
  • From: Mike Duffy
• Re: snowball earth and life
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Don't persecute religious fanatics. Point and laugh.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: reposted
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: heekster
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: heekster
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: reposted
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Peter Rathmann
• Re: In the News: Liberty University and its bio department
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• In the News: Liberty University and its bio department
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• snowball earth and life
  • From: Chris
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins'
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Evolution of Color Vision in Primates
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Colby Cosh by Gosh: Darwin on the half-shell
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• HuffPost: Oklahoma Legislature Investigates Richard Dawkins' Free
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: arfiend2009
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: reposted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: jr . herb
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: jr . herb
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: reposted
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: reposted
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: JennyB
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Allan Matthews
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Greg G.
• Ray's Deep Hole
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: kiss2b2
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "How low the almighty has fallen"
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Test
  • From: arfiend2009
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: arfiend2009
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: eerok
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: reposted
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Bill
• Re: reposted
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: backspace
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Greg Guarino
• 3 geld machen,geld machen im internet,wie verdient man geld im
  • From: johnx64352
• Re: Particles Have Free Will (Not a Nando post)
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: poland
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Particles Have Free Will (Not a Spintronics post)
  • From: JennyB
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Bill
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Bill
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• jesuit magazine 'america' on the 'year of astronomy'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Dementia?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Guido
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Definition of "evolution"
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• casys 09 cutting edge creationist science
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: reposted
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: FatBlackGas
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: "How low the almighty has fallen"
  • From: Iain
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Inez
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: hiding from radar
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: poland
• hiding from radar
  • From: Transition Zone
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Vend
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: nando_ronteltap
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: snex
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• The flood and genetics.. Where's the bottleneck ?
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Test
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: reposted
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Rolf
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: How To Be A Bat [Life in Motion]
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Rolf
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Colby Cosh by Gosh: Darwin on the half-shell
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: How To Be A Bat [Life in Motion]
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why 2.00000001?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Chris
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Why 2.00000001?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Wombat
• Re: reposted
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Dwib
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: sasam2
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: TomS
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: jimfcartwright
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: reposted
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Published Papers
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Published Papers
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: zeteticdds
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Chris
• Re: How To Be A Bat [Life in Motion]
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Chris
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: reposted
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: richard . smol
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: TomS
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: TomS
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Vend
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: TomS
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Ian Harvey
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: TomS
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Rolf
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: wf3h
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• How To Be A Bat [Life in Motion]
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Definition of "evolution"
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Rolf
• Re: reposted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• reposted
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: bussen
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Manolo Blahnik shoes collection
  • From: wwwdollartreeus
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• FREE software, free screensavers, economic trends, research, free
  • From: Vishwas
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Wombat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Glenn
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Definition of "evolution"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Texas State Board of Education targeted
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The scientific number of human hairs
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Boikat
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Definition of "evolution"
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Test
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Test
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: American Patriot?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Vend
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Vend
• Re: The scientific number of human hairs
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Test
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Study: Modern human vertebrae evolving to be weaker.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: wf3h
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: wf3h
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: eerok
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: archbisop to excommunicate rape victim's mother
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Mike Duffy
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: heekster
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: rupert . morrish
• Re: Vote to restart (or not) the February POTM ballot
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: evolution and lucy in 'national review'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: rupert . morrish
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Augray
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: heekster
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: chibiabos
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: heekster
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Dwib
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: MarkA
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Ray Martinez
• destruction of knowledge about natural selection
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Augray
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Bill
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: another test
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Strange Creature
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Commentary: Ignorance is not a civil right
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Study: Modern human vertebrae evolving to be weaker.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: evolution and lucy in 'national review'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Vend
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Rebellion
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Dr. Acula
• discredulous re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: complex specified information
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: ape rape re: complex specified information
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Vindicated
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: BBC hates nature
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Vindicated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: websearch
• Re: The scientific number of human hairs
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: poland
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Rebellion
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Study: Modern human vertebrae evolving to be weaker.
  • From: websearch
• Re: Study: Modern human vertebrae evolving to be weaker.
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Vend
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Commentary: Ignorance is not a civil right
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Study: Modern human vertebrae evolving to be weaker.
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• chez what Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Rebellion
  • From: snex
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: muslims ban use of term 'allah' by christians
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: snex
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Study: Modern human vertebrae evolving to be weaker.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Rebellion
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: muslims ban use of term 'allah' by christians
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Rebellion
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Chris
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: cesarbielich
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Donald Sauter
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Kari Tikkanen
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: TomS
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "How low the almighty has fallen"
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: another test
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Chris
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Boikat
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Canada: Science minister now believes in evolution, sort of
  • From: Iain
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Donald Sauter
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Wombat
• Commentary: The liberal war on faith
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Wombat
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Commentary: Ignorance is not a civil right
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Canada: Science minister now believes in evolution, sort of
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• evolution and lucy in 'national review'
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: 9fingers
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Will in New Haven
• News: Dinosaur find raises debate on feather evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: MarkA
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Chris
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: MarkA
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: MarkA
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Rob
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: MarkA
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Reentrant
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: prigator
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
  • From: Rolf
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Gene Poole
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Need to secure the Southern Border!
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: TomS
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: tandjtrainor
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: wf3h
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Need to secure the Southern Border!
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: TomS
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: dali_70
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Augray
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Rolf
• The Duration Of Ray's Research
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: TomS
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Need to secure the Southern Border!
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: TomS
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Ijon Tichy
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: JennyB
• Re: test
  • From: TomS
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: kleuske
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Properly Understanding the Rocks
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Benefits of Global Warming???
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Augray
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Chris
• Re: Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: Chris
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Chris
• Touch it. Hold it. Go on, do it
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Iain
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Need to secure the Southern Border!
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Chris
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Evolutoin of feathers perhaps moved earlier in time.
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Glenn
• Re: Some Lunatic
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: squealpiggy
• Re: (IVÁN): OUR RESURRECTED SAVIOR WAITS FOR YOU TO
  • From: Bodega
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Stuart
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Bob Berger
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: raven1
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Moist Lipwig
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: raven1
• Re: Need to secure the Southern Border!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• POTM (correct definition topic)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Augray
• Re: SPAM
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: GOP war on science (cont)
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: wf3h
• Re: another test
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: IMPERIUL ROMAN NU A AVUT NICIO INFLUENTHA EVIDENTA ASUPRA
  • From: Not Really With It
• Test
  • From: arfiend2009
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: American Patriot?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: IMPERIUL ROMAN NU A AVUT NICIO INFLUENTHA EVIDENTA ASUPRA
  • From: heekster
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: GOP war on science (cont)
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: websearch
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: rnorman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Kari Tikkanen
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: another test
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Deadly questions for creationists in debate ? (part II)
  • From: Kari Tikkanen
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: heekster
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: heekster
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: (IVÁN):
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: fcj3
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Burkhard
• Texas: Bill Would Allow Creationists to Grant Master's Degree in
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: cesarbielich
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Rich Mathers
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: snex
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Ray pulls a Tony; ignores repeated requests
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: lecody
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: hamilton
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Rolf
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Glenn
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: snex
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Proving the existence of ALLAH (SWT) to an atheist...
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Glenn
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: croyd62thoth
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Vend
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Vend
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: Vend
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Creation Model
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: a couple more re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: lecody
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• American Patriot?
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: a couple more re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: IMPERIUL ROMAN NU A AVUT NICIO INFLUENTHA EVIDENTA ASUPRA
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Away from Talk.Origins atheists are less disgusting
  • From: snex
• Re: IMPERIUL ROMAN NU A AVUT NICIO INFLUENTHA EVIDENTA ASUPRA ROM^NILOR
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: wf3h
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: tandjtrainor
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Chris
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: TomS
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Away from Talk.Origins atheists are less disgusting
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Away from Talk.Origins atheists are less disgusting
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: snex
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Part 2 - Merely Babylonian Mythology? Creation Theories?
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: tandjtrainor
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Moist Lipwig
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: bajumajuice
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: CIVIL discussion group
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Vote to restart (or not) the February POTM ballot
  • From: Chris
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Ray Martinez
• CIVIL discussion group
  • From: tandjtrainor
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Need to secure the Southern Border!
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: cesarbielich
• IMPERIUL ROMAN NU A AVUT NICIO INFLUENTHA EVIDENTA ASUPRA ROM^NILOR
  • From: hangeonos
• Re: End Running Malthus With Innovation
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Canada: Science minister now believes in evolution, sort of
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: snex
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Part 2 - Merely Babylonian Mythology? Creation Theories?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: Drafterman
• Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: (David P.)
• Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: tgdenning
• Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: (David P.)
• Need to legalize drugs!
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• AiG: Darwin got something right
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Honey, Oh sugar sugar.....
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Chris
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Chris
• Re: The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: May i have your attention please.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: evangelical religion to collapse?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: "Adman's Hypothesis on Brain Chemistry and the Perception of God"
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Chris
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Some Lunatic
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ye Old One
• Chez Watt: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: (IVÁN):
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Away from Talk.Origins creationists are less disgusting
  • From: Rolf
• The Reluctance of the Pious.
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: religious belief by age
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: Bill
• Re: Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: TomS
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Augray
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: === Talk Origin's Recommended KillFile list ====
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Augray
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: (IVÁN): OUR RESURRECTED SAVIOR WAITS FOR YOU TO
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Some Lunatic
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Re: Some Lunatic
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Some Lunatic
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Hey Ray!!!! Some Questions For You!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: jimfcartwright
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Canada: Science minister now believes in evolution, sort of
  • From: Martin Andersen
• Hey Ray!!!!
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Don't persecute religious fanatics. Point and laugh.
  • From: Susan S
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: (David P.)
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: What? Where? When? Why?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn )
  • From: fffffffffffffff
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: === Talk Origin's Recommended KillFile list ====
  • From: Boikat
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: sources of moral guidance
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Shermer interviews Creation Museum scientist
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Mike Painter
• Canada: Science minister now believes in evolution, sort of
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Evolution found wrong again
  • From: heekster
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: wf3h
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Robert Camp
• weird stratospheric UV resistant bacteria discovered
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: wf3h
• new member wants to give you all a gift
  • From: Business Guy
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: heekster
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Mike Duffy
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: === Talk Origin's Recommended KillFile list ====
  • From: heekster
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Vend
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Glenn
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: poland
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Glenn
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for February 2009 Vote Now! ***
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: jc
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Glenn
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Texas Board of Ed. chairman recommends a creationist book
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Augray
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for February 2009 Vote Now! ***
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: did the essenes exist and did they write the dead sea scrolls
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: heekster
• Re: Proving the existence of ALLAH (SWT) to an atheist...
  • From: heekster
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: rokimoto
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Mike Duffy
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Iain
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "How low the almighty has fallen"
  • From: fcj3
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: fcj3
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: {meta} clocks
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Glenn
• Re: Question on supply chain plan for World Pop. of 9 Billion
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: americans have more faith in scientists than in religious leaders
  • From: Walter Bushell
• OK, I knew Andy Schlafly was nuts, but...
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: What? Where? When? Why?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Klinghoffer chases his own tail - bites hard
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: GOP war on science (cont)
  • From: raven1
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Drafterman
• Re: Who thinks the debate is over?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Harun Yahya in the WSJ
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Spillerix
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Glenn
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Spillerix
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Schafly's moon
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vatican and evolution
  • From: Glenn
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Where you go wrong. "Again"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: John Harshman
• Creation Model (was: The correct definition.)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Vend
• Re: DNA, RNA and Protein questions
  • From: Bill
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: evolution and domestication of the dog
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Deadly questions for creationists (in debate) ?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Canada: Minister won't confirm belief in evolution
  • From: Jason Harvestdancer
• Re: T.O. claim grizzly bear to whale?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Vend
• Re: The correct definition.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: What is Evolution?
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT: Political compass
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Orgasm
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: How about that.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Guess what.
  • From: Walter Bushell