Re: Ribosome origin explained?

On Feb 21, 4:58 pm, "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmene...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Bill" <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:c8ae02dd-6387-430f-b484-eb316e8713f2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 21, 6:37 am, "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmene...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

If this is correct, it is the most important discovery regarding the
origin of life since - well ... - since the origin of life.

http://blogs.sciencemag.org/origins/2009/02/deconstructing-the-riboso...

Which makes this just one problem, evolutionists were unwilling to
admit, out of goodness knows how many.

Not 'unrelated to roulette', and totally 'related to chickens'. (maybe
some eggs).

Anyhoos, It's not a major challenge to replicate (ring 1, of the
onion).

So then we will know.

--------------
PiP: Cryptic as always, eh Spintronic?  Well, I can respond to
what I think the first sentence says by pointing out that I have
*never* downplayed the number or severity of problems with
the materialist account of abiogenesis.



For a ribosome, we are eons past abiogenesis.


 But the origin of the ribosome and translation has always been considered the
most intractable of the puzzles, and this paper may lead to
the solution of that puzzle.



But it doesn't. All it says is that it's a "puzzle in a puzzle".

A layer of onion rings (as it were). So again, if this paper is
correct, there should be *ABSOLUTELY* no problem making the most ever
primitave ribosome, from layer one.

It's all there in the "hypothesis". (Note "Hypothesis")

In fact, it is so easy, I am suprised they published their
"Hypothesis" before their experimental results.


When that happens, most likely there won't be any "experimental
results".


I'm not sure what the 'onion' comment was all about,


Then you haven't read the article.

but if you are saying that finding an explanation for the origin of
replicating RNA-world genes is only a part of the explanation
of the origin of life, I fully agree.  



As I have said in countless threads. (well a few).

Any rna that has function must not only be able to replicated, it must
also be stored in a genome at the same time.




Now that is a mojor headache.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Still Life sequel? (Spoiler)
    ... Allegedly we'll be seeing a Still Life 2 in November. ... I am will continue on for now I am stuck at a puzzle and I am making ... necklace and diamond shape beads on each side of the heart, ... on some parts of the lock it changes other parts. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure)
  • Puzzle Peace
    ... In my heart I wanted to succeed in life, ... My main goal in life is to help bring about world peace. ... I see world peace as a great big puzzle and by looking ...
    (soc.culture.usa)
  • Re: Who built these things?
    ... Very impressive examples of the work of Mars folks. ... wiped out the dinosaurs and much life on Earth. ... The puzzle is indeed ... differing sizes are falling onto a big puzzle sitting on that table we ...
    (rec.music.classical.guitar)
  • Re: Article: The Origin of Life
    ... There is no reason why life *must* become more ... Evolution is not a process driven by the "needs" of the individual. ... RNA can't replicate without proteins, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Still Life sequel? (Spoiler)
    ... Allegedly we'll be seeing a Still Life 2 in November. ... psychology than the gory details of exactly what the killer did. ... I am will continue on for now I am stuck at a puzzle and I am making ... The necklace she got from her father doesn't ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure)
Loading