Re: Genetic evidence for the origins of Mankind

[M]adman wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
[M]adman wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Feb 6, 10:00 am, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
[M]adman wrote:
Genetic evidence that Noah and his sons repopulated the earth.
http://www.ccg.org/english/s/p265.html
Wow. That is illiterate in so manyways. Did you write it?
Here's my favorite bit: "However, we now know that the
mitochondria are directly responsible for the mutations of the
human genetic structure. It inserts into active genes and causes
mutation. " You can't make this stuff up.
Of course, it is understood that anything written which disagrees
with you, the king of evolution, would be ridiculed.
you havent addressed the issue:

how do mitochondria cause mutations in nuclear DNA? this would be a
revolutionary discovery...even by a creationist. yet it's tossed
off without comment.

I think it may be a garbled understanding of mitochondrially
originating pseudogenes (numts). But it's hard to tell what the
author thinks he's talking about.
The paper clearly shows how Noah's sons could have repopulated the
earth.
"Clearly" isn't a word I would have used in connection with that
thing. It's an illiterate mess. I doubt you have actually read it. I
doubt you understand what it's saying; the author obviously doesn't.

But if you have read and understood it, what do the quoted sentences
mean? Here they are again: "However, we now know that the mitochondria
are directly responsible for the mutations of the human genetic
structure. It inserts into active genes and causes mutation."

It means exactly what it says.

Nice evasion. I conclude you have no idea. I notice that you have also evaded my questions about the nature of DNA and mutation. I conclude you know nothing about the biology of the various items you post.

.

Relevant Pages