Re: Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- From: Burkhard <b.schafer@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:23:50 -0800 (PST)
On 7 Feb, 00:43, Jason Spaceman <notrea...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------------------------------
Christians devoted to promoting balanced science education in public
schools have every reason to be disgruntled.
yeah, let's use the political art of compromise in the science
curriculum. Some people believe 5+1 equals 6, others may think it
equal 8, so let's teach our children that it equals 7 and everybody is
happy.
Indeed, Dawkins would never acknowledge the existence of an omniscient,
omnipresent God, as doing so would mean human life has intrinsic value,
moral absolutes exist
not really. Either actions are intrinsically good and can be rational
identified as such - no God needed. Or actions are only good because
God says they are - and we have moral relativism, as tomorrow he might
change his mind,
The battle for academic freedom in the scientific arena is far from over,
but Christians can take active measures to combat the evident bias
against intelligent design and creationism.
with other words: Let's subpoena reality for being biased
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- From: R.Dean
- Re: Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- From: Steven L.
- Re: Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- References:
- Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- From: Jason Spaceman
- Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- Prev by Date: Re: Seeking Creationism/ID reference material
- Next by Date: Re: In the News: Dutch anchor man falls from grace
- Previous by thread: Re: Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- Next by thread: Re: Commentary: Challenging Darwin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
