Re: origin of hybrids

chris thompson wrote:
On Jan 23, 3:38 pm, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
chris thompson wrote:
On Jan 22, 6:50 pm, SkyEyes <skyey...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 20, 5:22 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[M]adman wrote:
Elijahovah wrote:
Noah and his three sons and their three wives
did not have hybrids from Cain
in their genes.

They were the first recorded to make a hybrid horse donkey mule.

You do realize, don't you that legendary accounts such as what you
posted, are not considered to be actual history? It's highly
unlikely the the first human to breed mules was the Cain of the
Bible. It's common among legends to ascribe the origin of
practices to some figure from earlier legends. There's no
evidence that Cain even existed.

And furthermore, wild donkeys and wild horses occasionally get the
notion *all by themselves* to interbreed, without any interference
or help from humans.

Don't you know they never did that before the fall? It's all a
result of Cain's actions. As a matter of fact, animals never fucked
before the fall, or at least they never did it where people could
see it.

Chris

It was Kain's actions and the first record event regarding the
breeding for mules.

There was never any such person. It's a fantasy.

[chuckle] So everything written about him in Hebrew texts, as well as in
independent cultures is a lie?

Get real.

For a change.


Donkeys and Horses did NOT and still DO NOT seek each other out as
mates.

Well, yes they do.

Assertion with no proof. If they did this we should have a few hundred
thousand (at the very least) running around the earth right now AND
evolution would have seperated them into their own species by now according
to your silly theory of evolutuion. (smile)

And on the VERY VERY rare occasion when they have, nature has built a
sterility factor to the offspring mule to prevent a further
bastardizing.

So, they NEVER DID and STILL DO NOT--- EXCEPT WHEN THEY DO.

Right.

So, you know nothing of equine biology. What a non-surprise.

And you have zero knowledge of historical facts. You think all of history is
one big lie just to amuse you. You cannot even distinguish between fact and
fiction it seems.

Oh, and you are going to love this one.

Before the fall some animals could communicate with man.

That's news? Many still can. My dogs are quite expressive. Have you
ever bothered to study _any_ other living thing?

I am sure your dogs are great, however..

You misunderstand (as usual). But this time it is probably my fault. I was
not specific enough. I had assumed that by saying "Before the fall" you
would understand that i meant a different form of communication then we see
with animals today after the fall.

To clear this up:
By communicate prior to the fall, i mean some animals could actually
converse with humans as well as understand us.


And some of them are smarter then a lot of humans now. Like you for
instance

I must say, that's a less childish insult than is usual for you. But
that bar's set pretty low.

I have to set it low. Look whom I respond to.


Chris

.

Loading