Re: Life on Mars!
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:58:33 +0000, Féachadóir <Féach@d.óir> enriched
this group when s/he wrote:
Scríobh Cory Albrecht <coryalbrecht@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Féachadóir wrote, on 2009-01-16 04:47:
At least, that's the headline in today's (UK) Sun.
And that headline is typical journalistic over statement. I.e. bad
science journalism.
It's the Sun. Journalism has nothing to do with it.
Unless it is on page 3.
--
Bob.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: bowling for cars
... Andrew Marr's book "My Trade" is a bit heavy-going in places, but well worth ... a read to understand how journalism works. ... Oh, I dunno, the Sun can be entertaining. ... the same stable as Fox News and you shouldn't believe everything they write. ...
(alt.sysadmin.recovery) - Re: BREAKING THE ESOTERIC BARRIER
... Scientific American used to be a pretty good magazine when they ... a brand of science journalism which, to caricature, is practiced ... In this brand or journalism, ... Another brand of science journalism can be caricatured as being ...
(sci.bio.evolution) - Geo content, AmSci mag
... the previous editorship of Scientific American - has some ... nice geology content. ... oasis of good science journalism on the popular magazine shelves. ...
(sci.geo.geology) - Re: The Press is the Problem
... (Headline): "Tour de France in Turmoil Again Because of Doping ... the Tour is derailed or something. ... Big mistake, letting running the show go "out of house", and having ... Journalism in general seems to have a lot more in ...
(rec.bicycles.racing) |
|
