Re: Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? NO! It is SUPER transitional!

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:53:40 -0600, "[M]adman" <grat@xxxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:

Caranx latus wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:38 am, wf3h <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 11, 12:43 am, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Baron Bodissey wrote:
On Jan 10, 9:25 pm, "[M]adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tiktaalik rosae. humm...

I have been doing so reading in Tiktaalik rosae (so-called
lobe-finned fish); And if anyone thinks THIS is a missing link
and a classic example of a transitional between two different
types of animal spread out over millions of years believes a
fairy tale.

Perception - The Mind Sees What the Mind Wants to See. We perceive
what we want to perceive.

It is easier to believe in a sky pixie that loves you.

--
It is all about the sky pixie truth with:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
·.¸Adman¸.·
^^^^^^^^^^^

Easy to say, but meaningless. What, exactly, about it is not
transitional? What bothers you about it, aside, of course, from the
fact that it exists and it gives the lie to your irrational
beliefs?

Here is irrational:
Species X turns into Species Z over millions of years BECAUSE we
found species Y somewhere in the middle of those millions of years.

[chuckle]

Despite the fact that we truly do not know if the dating methods
are sound, nor did we have a time machine to go back and do
observations.

[more chuckles]

uh huh. Evolution is like the joke: "pull my finger". Full of hot
gas

--

who said the dating methods aren't sound? some lunatic religious
fanatic?

Yes, indeed. [M]adman requires the dating methods to be unsound so
that he has some kind of sand to throw in the eyes of evolution. He
can't articulate why they're unsound, so instead he just "perceives"
that they are. He is seeing exactly what he needs to see.

Your dating methods _are_ unsound.

They are perfectly sound.

Nothing can be dated that old and that
accurately.

In most cases more than one test can be carried out. If two different
test produce the same result.... Well, you get the idea.

Science cannot seem to get us off of fossil fuel but can accurately date
something hundreds of millions of years old?

Yes, because it is relatively easy to do.

yeah, riiiiight... in a fantasy

no, we are not talking about you.



sorry...just 'cuz you live in an intellectual outhouse doesn't mean
others have to as well
--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages
Loading