Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:59:54 -0800 (PST), Ray Martinez
<pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

On Jan 2, 8:56 pm, Earle Jones <earle.jo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<8a7b6c06-a3c5-4eba-b24d-58a7cd77c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

The evolutionists have intentionally evaded and misrepresented the
plain facts produced by Dr. Scott. This proves the Creationist claim
that they will lie brazenly without hesitation.

Since evolutionists are angry enough and hateful enough to give God
the finger and say humans originated from apes, we should not be
surprised with their behavior here. Persons who are evil enough to say
humans originated from apes are capable of anything. Denying the plain
and simple facts here, in comparison to human evolution lies, is just
another day at the office for Atheists.

Ray

*
Ray:

That's beautiful!  Amazing!  You have outdone yourself.

"Evolutionists are hateful and angry enough to 'give God the finger'...."

And... "Humans that say that humans originated from apes are capable of
anything."

Beautiful!

If he weren't dead, Jerry Falwell would give you a pat on the back!

If I decide that humans originated from apes (as about 95% of all
scientifically literate people would agree), then I am "capable of
anything"?  Is that right?

Actually, I only wish that were true.  For then, being capable of
anything, I would stamp out ignorance and superstition, which would
leave you on an island of incompetence and irrationality all by yourself.

***
Ray:  I live about ten minutes from Stanford.  I would be happy to run
over to the Department of Education and check with the Registrar and
verify Dr. Scott's degree.  My personal belief is that he received a PhD
from the Department of Education.  (I read this in the Stanford Alumni
Newsletter.) You claim that this degree was not issued by the
Department, but by the University, implying that it was somehow
different, and therefore somehow more valuable, from the dozens of other
degrees the Department issued.

If that is not your claim, please correct me.


It is not a claim. It is a fact from Dr. Scott's mouth.

You mean the guy who had to lie about his education to make himself
look big?

Of course you
have already assumed the general description of his degree

You mean the bog standard degree he got rather than the bogus one he
lied about.

to harm the
fact. Again, I stress *assumption."

I will head over there tomorrow or the next day.

(Actually, it being Friday, I will probably wait until next Monday or
Tuesday.)

earle
*

His degree is actually in Philosophy & Religion, awarded by the
University itself. Larry Thomas was his major prof.

It was a normal degree, nothing special.

Dr. Scott is also the only person to request an oral exam in
Geography, it was granted and he passed (worth 45 units), having never
taken a class at Stanford.

He may have claimed that, but is it true. Given his track record I
doubt it very much.

There is no reason to doubt Dr. Scott.

There are a lot of reasons to doubt him.

Evolutionists simply assume
lie. The evil assumption is explained when we remember that Dr. Scott
refuted evolutionary theory.

Liar!

Evolutionists are simply angry and see no
other way to discredit the refutation.

And you hardly need my permission to do anything, whether you live
near Stanford or not.

But Dishonest Ray, the facts have already been tested - and Stanford
proved that Gene 'Expletive Deleted' Scott had lied about his
education.

Ray
--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
    ... plain facts produced by Dr. Scott. ... humans originated from apes are capable of anything. ... "Evolutionists are hateful and angry enough to 'give God the finger'..." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
    ... plain facts produced by Dr. Scott. ... that they will lie brazenly without hesitation. ... "Evolutionists are hateful and angry enough to 'give God the finger'...." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re:stevie know shit
    ... > archaic demands" is a baldfaced lie and meant to do nothing more than ... > I claim that Leonard H Anderson is a liar. ... Making erros of facts even if done doesn't make make one a lair, ... >> they freely admit to not confroming to YOUR notion of reality, ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.policy)
  • Re: About Mr.Sharons Decision to lie and defame ...
    ... About Mr.Sharon's Decision to lie and defame ... ... You should NOT jump to any conclusions before the facts are known. ... Here are Mr. Sharon's remarks waiting for refutation: ... remaining in Poland, Vilna and elsewhere. ...
    (soc.culture.polish)
  • Re: Cuban Medical Assistance Abroad (AIN)
    ... Here again we see desperate Dan in action. ... dollars a year from renting out doctors he snips the facts. ... Every time you post that lie about me I post the truth about you. ... that he does, in fact, support an immediate and unconditional lifting ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
Loading